In the central Ohio town of Dublin, parents and community leaders are expressing growing fears that young people might succumb to the Islamic State’s savvy social media appeal to join its fight on battlefields in Iraq and Syria.
However, when US Secretary of Homeland Security Jeh Johnson showed up recently at the Noor Islamic Cultural Center to offer a sympathetic ear and federal assistance, he faced a litany of grievances from a group of mostly Muslim leaders and advocates.
They complained of humiliating border inspections by brusque federal agents, FBI sting operations that wrongly targeted Muslim citizens as terrorists and a foreign policy that leaves Syrian President Bashar al-Assad in place as a magnet for extremists.
Illustration: Yusha
“Our relationship has to be built on trust, but the US government hasn’t given us very many reasons to build up that trust,” said Omar Saqr, 25, the cultural center’s youth coordinator.
As the US carries out yet another bombing campaign across two Islamic countries, US President Barack Obama’s administration is redoubling its efforts to stanch the flow of radicalized young Muslim Americans traveling to Syria to join the fight and potentially returning as well-trained militants to carry out attacks in the US.
US law enforcement and intelligence officials say more than 100 Americans have gone to Syria, or tried to so far. That number of Americans seeking to join militants, while still small, was never seen during the two major wars fought in Afghanistan and Iraq after the Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks.
The threat of homegrown radicals like the Boston Marathon bombers has prompted the FBI, the Department of Homeland Security and other federal agencies to try to forge ties with community leaders and police departments as a front line in the war against a sophisticated online propaganda and recruiting effort mounted by the Islamic State, formerly known as the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant.
However, as administration officials attempt to accelerate their own lobbying campaign, they have found that security rules put in place to defend the US from a terror attack have played a role in alienating young Muslim men and women — the exact group being courted by the Islamic State.
Still, community leaders are so fearful their young people might follow the Islamic State’s propaganda that, during a 90-minute meeting with more than 60 local leaders, police officers and advocates, they pressed Johnson to prove the government is sincere in its offers of help.
Lila al-Sibai, a 28-year-old mother of three young children and a member of the cultural center’s board, asked for a US$4 million federal grant to build a new gym and classrooms for the facility.
“We need to have more activities for our youth,” she said after the meeting in the suburb of Columbus, which is home to the nation’s second-largest Somali-American community, behind only Minneapolis.
Youth coordinator Saqr said that Johnson’s agency offers a prize to the best counter message to the propaganda of the Islamic State, which is alternately known as ISIS or ISIL.
“Our youth are being hoodwinked and hijacked by their rhetoric,” he said. “We cannot just say ISIS is bad. That’s not an option. We need an outlet.”
Hossam Musa, 34, the imam of the cultural center, which draws 4,000 to 5,000 people for Friday prayers each week, proposed that the Homeland Department hire authoritative Islamic academics to help combat the Islamic State’s violent narrative.
“How do we beat ISIL? What’s our response to a young man wowed by their message? You beat them at their own game,” he said.
Johnson, the nation’s top homeland security official since December last year, was visiting as part of a community outreach tour that so far this year has taken him to the Chicago area, and is to land him in Los Angeles, New York and other cities in the coming months.
His aim is to build partnerships between the federal government and the local law enforcement, educational and community groups, which are better positioned to detect potential militants in their midst and to derail those young men and women from the path of radicalization before they turn violent.
These efforts have been under way since the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, but have often failed to gain traction, government officials acknowledge.
“We can’t allow youth to fall prey to ISIL’s ideology,” Johnson said. “We need to provide them an alternative to rechannel their hopes and rechannel their passions.”
It is a clarion call also sounded by the FBI, the US Department of Justice and the US National Counterterrorism Center, which, with Johnson’s agency, recently started pilot programs in Boston, Los Angeles and Minneapolis, Minnesota.
The goal is to reach out to schools, healthcare providers and community groups to get their help to monitor and deter the radicalization of young people who might be susceptible to recruitment — like the two brothers who carried out the Boston Marathon bombings, which killed four people last year.
The White House is sponsoring a meeting later this fall with specialists from across the nation.
Yet even former top counterterrorism officials say the administration faces an uphill battle.
US officials have been able to identify Americans fighting for the Islamic State or other Syrian rebel groups based on intelligence gathered from travel records, family members, intercepted electronic communications, social media postings and surveillance of Americans overseas who had expressed interest in going to Syria, counterterrorism officials said.
However, efforts at countering violent extremism, especially in the US, “have lagged badly behind other counterterrorism pillars,” former director of the National Counterterrorism Center Michael Leiter said. “It is heartening to see the administration attempt to invigorate those efforts, but it is unfortunate that it has, despite the efforts of many, been so long in coming.”
Government supporters question whether funds will be available to sustain these programs.
“The administration has the right framework for doing this, but long-term success will depend on sustainable resourcing to help local government, communities and law enforcement build initiatives that can have impact,” said Quintan Wiktorowicz, a former senior White House aide who was one of the principal architects of the current strategy.
That strategy in the US, called countering violent extremism, has proved much more difficult for US officials to master than the ability of the Pentagon and spy agencies to identify, track, capture and, if necessary, kill terrorists overseas.
Among its efforts, the Homeland Department provides training to help state and local law enforcement officials to identify and counter threats, including indicators of violent extremism and “lone wolf” attacks.
The department awarded the International Association of Chiefs of Police a US$700,000 grant last year to develop training on how to prevent, respond to and recover from acts of terrorism.
The Homeland Department has also sponsored exercises in seven cities, including Houston, Texas; Seattle; and Durham, North Carolina, to improve communication between local law enforcement and communities, and to share ideas on how best to build community resilience against violent extremism.
“We’re raising awareness,” said David Gersten, who was recently named the Homeland Department’s coordinator for the overall effort.
US attorney in the Columbus area Carter Stewart said he and his staff meet regularly with Somali-American and other community leaders.
However, Muslim advocates say there is deep suspicion that, despite all the meetings and the talk of outreach, the government’s main goal is to recruit informants to root out suspected terrorists.
“I don’t know how we can have a partnership with the same government that spies on you,” National Network for Arab American Communities advocacy director Linda Sarsour said.
Indeed, those who met with Johnson were conflicted, some saying they were pleasantly surprised he had traveled to put a face on the federal effort, but clearly embittered by their past experiences with the government.
Syrian-American ophthalmologist Iyad Azrak, 37, recounted how he and his family had been forced on numerous trips to Canada to wait for hours at border crossings while inspectors reviewed his records.
“Not once when we’re coming home do they say to me: ‘Welcome home,’” Azrak said, adding that he has been a naturalized US citizen for six years.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers