It is a story that has played out worldwide: Internet adoption reaches critical mass, changing how business is conducted and creating billion-dollar markets for digital goods and services — and causing massive “creative destruction.” Now China is to experience this phenomenon — only, in China’s case, it comes amid broad economic transformation and rapid social change.
The collision of these forces could transform the world’s second-largest economy.
With 632 million users, China’s Internet has already produced a dynamic technology sector, thriving social networks and the world’s largest e-tail market. Global investors’ excitement about the initial public offering of China’s largest online retailer, Alibaba, reflects the scale of the economic value that has already been created.
However, most of the action has been on the consumer side. Key sectors, from manufacturing to healthcare, have not moved past the early stages of the shift online. As of 2012, only about one-quarter of China’s small and medium-sized enterprises had started to use the Internet in areas like procurement, sales and marketing — meaning that the most sweeping changes lie ahead.
As traditional industries increase their Web use, they streamline operations, find new methods of collaboration and expand their reach through e-commerce — all of which accelerate productivity growth.
The McKinsey Global Institute projects that new Web applications could enable as much as 22 percent of China’s total GDP growth through 2025.
The Internet can also boost transparency and trust. E-tailing, for example, began with a cash-on-delivery model. However, over time, online payment platforms gained Chinese consumers’ trust, paving the way for explosive growth.
Other industries are beginning to follow suit. Online real-estate databases match buyers and sellers faster, while reducing price premiums stemming from information asymmetries. Such platforms have been created for land auctions and foreclosures, as well as private transactions.
Similarly, China’s nascent used-car market stands to benefit from the Internet revolution, as e-commerce boosts the transparency of vehicle listings and transactions and new online tools help lenders acquire and analyze credit histories in a more detailed and sophisticated way.
Of course, building a trust-based system is no easy feat. Much of the Internet’s commercial potential stems from data collection, sharing and analysis, which are fraught with privacy concerns.
Even though Beijing established preliminary rules governing online privacy in 2012, many gray areas remain, including basic issues such as the types of information companies can share, how that data can be used and what constitutes consumer consent.
In addition to clarifying the legal framework for data sharing, Beijing can set an example by using the Internet to render its own data collection and transaction records more uniform and systematic. Moreover, by making some of its own data sets publicly available, it can accelerate an open-data movement and pave the way for the emergence of related industries.
For Chinese firms, such a movement would have to be accompanied by a fundamental change in mentality. Instead of focusing on large-scale, one-size-fits-all production, firms must use the data they receive to glean detailed insights about consumers’ wants and expectations — and expand their portfolios to include the niche products that consumers crave.
Given that the Internet empowers consumers to compare offerings directly and choose the most economical and attractive option, firms that attempt to adhere to business as usual will quickly be overtaken by their competitors. Of course, such intense competition will erode firms’ profit margins — a trend that they can offset by integrating Web technologies into back-office functions and logistics.
Another shift to be expected is that the most innovative and flexible — not necessarily the largest or most established — enterprises will be the most successful. The Internet enables startups to scale up rapidly and at a low cost, unburdened traditional methods of doing business, while blurring the lines between sectors.
As a result, new players can emerge suddenly to challenge long-established institutions. Nowhere is this more apparent than in banks’ current scramble to defend their territory from online financial-services providers.
The Internet revolution will also disrupt the labor market, with some jobs being automated into obsolescence and companies facing a shortage of technologically proficient workers. A company’s success will depend on its employees’ willingness to acquire new skills, undertake new roles and adapt to the faster pace and unfamiliar demands of the digital marketplace.
However, the onus of adaptation does not rest entirely on workers. Policymakers and business leaders must ensure that displaced workers have options for retraining and that the education system is producing enough technologically savvy workers.
The Internet will not only create economic momentum for China in the years ahead: It will help to transform an unsustainable growth model based on fixed investment and cheap labor. By unleashing the economy’s potential, the Internet can help China reach its goal: developing a growth model that can lift the nation to high-income status.
Jiang Qiping is secretary-general of the Information Research Center at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences. Jonathan Woetzel is a McKinsey and McKinsey Global Institute director in Shanghai.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers
Gogoro Inc was once a rising star and a would-be unicorn in the years prior to its debut on the NASDAQ in 2022, as its environmentally friendly technology and stylish design attracted local young people. The electric scooter and battery swapping services provider is bracing for a major personnel shakeup following the abrupt resignation on Friday of founding chairman Horace Luke (陸學森) as chief executive officer. Luke’s departure indicates that Gogoro is sinking into the trough of unicorn disillusionment, with the company grappling with poor financial performance amid a slowdown in demand at home and setbacks in overseas expansions. About 95