On Sept. 25, aviation police held up a China Airlines civilian flight bound for the US from Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport after discovering components for missile warheads during security checks. The incident caused alarm at the airport and among local security agencies, raising concerns that the weapons parts were being smuggled out for a terrorist organization. It was subsequently revealed that the components belonged to the Ministry of National Defense, which was sending faulty components back to the US for repair, and that the concerns were unfounded. The incident was widely reported by local media and although it was confirmed to be a false alarm due to a misunderstanding — to the relief of many — it should never have happened.
The parts the military was sending to the US for repairs were from a guidance system for 36 AIM-120 missile warheads. This is a matter of some gravity, which should have been conducted in secrecy, but for some reason the ministry neglected to inform the Aviation Police Bureau during preparations to ship the components. The bureau would have been guilty of serious dereliction of duty had it failed to discover the shipment. Imagine if these military weapons were being sent by anyone other than the authorities, or if it were possible to get such equipment through Taiwan’s airports without any checks being done. This is the stuff of nightmares. What if this military equipment had been shipped in the absence of any kind of security measures and had been nabbed en route by terrorists or a terrorist organization?
It is just as well that the airport police did hold up the weapons. At least it shows that the nation’s airport security is effective. However, at the same time, it also reveals how sloppy the defense ministry’s operating procedures are. The transportation of advanced missile systems components should have been kept secret, and yet, due to inadequate communication between the ministry and the aviation police, as well as procedural negligence by the airline in its failure to ensure proper documentation — stating that there were no safety concerns — the bureau’s intervention was exposed. As a result, details such as the method by which the military transports equipment, the model and exact number of missile warheads being sent for repair on this occasion, and that the US was willing to replace the warhead components for free, were laid out for all the world to see.
Taiwan finds itself in unusual circumstances. Purchasing military weapons is complicated. The US, under the terms of the Taiwan Relations Act, provides Taiwan with weaponry to protect itself, but to avoid interference or objections from China, any activity involving weapons procurement or maintenance, or personnel training, needs to be discreet or conducted in absolute secrecy. Despite this, and even though the personnel involved have a duty to maintain confidentiality, they cannot be careless and omit any of the administrative procedures or notification protocols. In this case, the omission of a simple notification document meant that the method by which the military transports major pieces of military equipment has been revealed, and details about US-Taiwan military cooperation exposed. The defense ministry and the entire national defense system will need to be thoroughly reviewed, and those responsible for these lapses disciplined.
Due to the negligence of the military, all and sundry now know certain defense secrets, making the ministry a national and international laughing stock. The defense ministry cannot pass the buck to the aviation police or China Airlines. It needs to conduct an internal and external review of its practices, and establish new procedures for the transportation of military equipment. It cannot allow this kind of thing to happen again and expose itself to more ridicule.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers