University students in Hong Kong on Monday began a week-long boycott of classes to show Beijing their resolve to secure true universal suffrage for the territory. The Hong Kong student movement and Taiwan’s Sunflower movement will both become major milestones in Chinese-speaking democracy.
The Hong Kong boycott aims to counter colonialist control and screening of candidates for the territory’s chief executive. Although sovereignty of the former British colony was handed over in 1997, China has continued the colonial system of governance.
The British set up several functional constituencies in the Legislative Council so that the business world and professional groups could participate in the system of representative democracy. The difference is that when the British were in control, these constituencies were limited to business and professional groups, but under Beijing, they include the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), pro-Beijing establishment factions and tycoons, all of whom wield control over government policy. The public continues to have limited influence over the political process. This is why the students say they oppose colonialism.
Prior to 1997, the CCP gave assurances that it would maintain a “one country, two systems” administration in Hong Kong, with a high degree of autonomy, democratic governance and no change to the system for 50 years. However, it has reneged on these promises.
The Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress on Aug. 31 released its resolution on Hong Kong’s political reform, putting an end to hopes for democratic universal suffrage and causing many democracy activists in the territory to lose all faith in China. When Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) met a business delegation headed by former Hong Kong chief executive Tung Chee-hwa (董建華) on Monday, he confirmed that Beijing would not budge.
There are differences between the student movements in Hong Kong and Taiwan. The former is trying to secure political freedoms, while the latter is opposed to the government’s handling of an economic issue, namely the lack of transparency in negotiations over the cross-strait service trade agreement. However, at the core of both lies a distrust of China, and both demonstrate that Beijing’s “one China, two systems” formula is bankrupt for Hong Kongers and Taiwanese alike.
Civil society in both Taiwan and Hong Kong is awakening, and the two are learning from each other as they seek ways to counter Beijing’s political and economic machinations. The international community is keenly observing the unfolding situation, which is also facilitating the growth of a fledgling democracy movement in China proper.
The Chinese Communist Party regime relies on totalitarian rule. It distrusts and fears its own people, and certainly panics at the thought of a democracy movement catching hold in China. It sees anyone who seeks more rights as an enemy with separatist or independence designs.
China is already making preparations to counter what it imagines are separatist elements within Hong Kong. Its approach could not be more different from the British government’s handling of Scotland’s desire for an independence referendum.
If Beijing wants to win back trust, it could do worse than learn from the British government’s approach toward Scotland. It should have the confidence to allow Hong Kongers greater democratic rights and truly implement “one country, two systems.” Hong Kong would be a democratic trial run for China proper, which could perhaps not only regain the trust of the territory’s residents, but also win the goodwill of the Taiwanese.
Former Chinese leader Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平) set China on the road to economic liberalization. Now would be the time for his heirs to embrace more political freedoms.
However, given Xi’s actions since taking office, punters can probably safely bet on the opposite.
On March 22, 2023, at the close of their meeting in Moscow, media microphones were allowed to record Chinese Communist Party (CCP) dictator Xi Jinping (習近平) telling Russia’s dictator Vladimir Putin, “Right now there are changes — the likes of which we haven’t seen for 100 years — and we are the ones driving these changes together.” Widely read as Xi’s oath to create a China-Russia-dominated world order, it can be considered a high point for the China-Russia-Iran-North Korea (CRINK) informal alliance, which also included the dictatorships of Venezuela and Cuba. China enables and assists Russia’s war against Ukraine and North Korea’s
After thousands of Taiwanese fans poured into the Tokyo Dome to cheer for Taiwan’s national team in the World Baseball Classic’s (WBC) Pool C games, an image of food and drink waste left at the stadium said to have been left by Taiwanese fans began spreading on social media. The image sparked wide debate, only later to be revealed as an artificially generated image. The image caption claimed that “Taiwanese left trash everywhere after watching the game in Tokyo Dome,” and said that one of the “three bad habits” of Taiwanese is littering. However, a reporter from a Japanese media outlet
The Iran war has exposed a fundamental vulnerability in the global energy system. The escalating confrontation between Iran, Israel and the US has begun to shake international energy markets, largely because Iran is disrupting shipping through the Strait of Hormuz. This narrow waterway carries roughly one-third of the world’s seaborne oil, making it one of the most strategically sensitive energy corridors in the world. Even the possibility of disruption has triggered sharp volatility in global oil prices. The duration and scope of the conflict remain uncertain, with senior US officials offering contradictory signals about how long military operations might continue.
An article published in the Dec. 12, 1949, edition of the Central Daily News (中央日報) bore a headline with the intimidating phrase: “You Cannot Escape.” The article was about the execution of seven “communist spies,” some say on the basis of forced confessions, at the end of the 713 Penghu Incident. Those were different times, born of political paranoia shortly after the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) relocated to Taiwan following defeat in China by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). The phrase was a warning by the KMT regime to the local populace not to challenge its power or threaten national unity. The
RSS