Oliver Chen’s fatal ride
It was with great sadness that I read of Oliver Chen’s (陳瑞光) death this week (“Leading Sunflower movement member dies in accident,” Sept. 18, page 3). Oliver was instrumental in bringing the voices of the Sunflower movement to the international stage during the occupation of the Legislative Yuan in March and April this year, and I fondly remember tuning in to listen to his reports from the chamber as events unfolded.
Hugely talented and multilingual, Oliver was key to facilitating awareness of the movement abroad, and his ability to communicate across language barriers made it possible for foreign observers in Taiwan to report on and generate international media awareness of what was a historical and hugely important development in the consolidation of the nation’s fragile democracy.
Although the reports on Oliver’s death have been sparse in detail, a number of troubling questions remain, which I hope prosecutors and investigators make every effort to answer beyond doubt, if only to bring some small measure of comfort to his family and friends.
I hope that prosecutors will order a full autopsy to determine the exact cause of death and identify whether Oliver had any injuries inconsistent with a motorcycle crash, as well as full fingerprinting analysis of his body and his motorcycle. Furthermore, a toxicology test should be carried out to see if Oliver had been under the influence of any drug, such as alcohol, that might have impaired his driving ability.
According to media reports, Oliver supposedly fell over the edge of a barrier about 9m into a valley, yet officers have said that the concrete barrier showed no signs of impact.
Although the barrier is low, the relatively dry conditions, as a picture in a China Times report showed, lend a certain improbability to the theory that his motorcycle suddenly lost traction and slipped underneath him, propelling him over the edge.
As someone who has been in a motorcycle accident involving the loss of traction, it is my experience that the force projecting you down, not up, is considerable and immediate.
Finally, I would urge police not to categorize this incident as an “accident” until it is proven beyond doubt.
Their investigation also needs to include Oliver’s mobile phone records and Internet activity immediately prior to and during his journey to Yilan, since apparently neither his mother nor partner knew why he was traveling to Yilan by motorcycle so late on a weekday evening.
If he was going to meet someone, that person should come forward and fully cooperate with investigators. Roadside cameras need to be examined to check whether there was any other traffic on the road around the same time and for possible witnesses.
In light of other accidents that have befallen active citizens over the past few years, including Black Island National Youth Front spokesman Dennis Wei (魏揚) and Taiwan Rural Front secretary-general Frida Tsai (蔡培慧), and in light of numerous threats various members of the Sunflower movement have received, not to mention the ubiquitous and pervasive activity and influence of “black gold” elements in Taiwanese society and politics, it is both sad and unpleasant that we cannot discount the specter of foul play or immediately rule it out as extremely improbable.
I therefore hope the authorities will take extra care with their investigation to clarify the exact events that led to Oliver’s death as soon as possible.
Oliver was much loved and his legacy as part of the Sunflower movement and Taiwanese democracy will live on after his death. He will be greatly missed.
Ben Goren
Taipei
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS