This week has seen a wide assortment of remarks from a wide variety of people — well, mostly politicians — that beggar belief. With such a cornucopia to choose from, it was hard to pick favorites. The underlying factor unifying the disparate utterances highlighted below is an apparently callous indifference to the rights of individuals, be it political choices or privacy.
First, National People’s Congress Standing Committee deputy secretary-general Li Fei (李飛), who braved demonstrators in Hong Kong on Monday to say that offering voters too much of a choice in the 2017 elections for the territory’s next chief executive would only leave voters “confused.”
Having to choose between several candidates would be troubling because “people may not know what they advocate and what they have achieved,” he said, adding that limiting the numbers of possible candidates would “guarantee genuine choice for voters.”
Not that a Beijing apparatchik — or anyone in the Chinese Communist Party — would know about voter choice, but remember what happened ahead of the last chief executive election in March 2012, when Beijing had to make a choice. The Chinese government thought it had the perfect candidate in former Hong Kong chief secretary for administration Henry Tang (唐英年), until the discovery of an illegally built basement “leisure space” under his house outraged the territory’s cramped residents. Tang blamed it on his wife, but to no avail, and Beijing was forced to go for a backup, government adviser Leung Chun-ying (梁振英), who then won the election to no one’s surprise.
It seems Beijing did not know as much about what Tang “had achieved” as it thought. Perhaps it just wants to spare Hong Kong voters the pain it went through in finding its preferred candidate was a loser.
Second in the stupidity sweepstakes was formergeneral-turned-premier Hau Pei-tsun (郝柏村), who on Wednesday proclaimed that Taiwan’s fate was not up to its people. It had not been “in the past, is not possible now and will not be possible in the future… the Republic of China’s future ought to be decided by all Chinese people,” he said.
It is true that the people living in Taiwan in 1895 did not get to vote on being given to Japan by the Qing Dynasty, neither were the people of China asked to vote on the issue. “It has always been like this” is not much of an excuse for trampling on the rights of a nation.
Third are the faceless people behind the members-only Facebook page known as pai she (拍社) that bill their creation as a “special candid community.” Turns out the community is neither special, nor candid, unless you take a pervert’s delight at poring over photographs of unsuspecting females whose breasts, thighs, buttocks or other portions of their anatomy were deemed worthy of photographing by strangers in shopping malls and other public places.
The Facebook page creators said they are only sharing photographs of beautiful female bodies for their members to enjoy, while their defenders accused critics of ruining “many young men’s pleasure.”
It is not special because, unfortunately, the Internet is filled with Web sites that specialize in these kinds of photographs, and far more explicit depictions. There is nothing candid about men — specifically men, because membership in pai she was restricted to males — who secretly take photographs up females’ skirts or down their blouses or dress tops.
A common excuse is that females are asking for attention by wearing short skirts or shorts and skimpy tops, especially in hot summer months, so why not photograph them? Why is the same not said about men who walk around with their T-shirts hiked to their armpits in a bid to stay cool? They are rarely the focus of a Facebook page or a magazine spread.
Taking secret photographs is an invasion of privacy. Depriving people of their right to choose their elected leader is an abuse of human rights. Stupid is stupid.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers