President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) reiterated that the government is committed to developing forms of renewable energy, on Sunday, stressing that this is an era when people should not give up any energy options, but what he meant was that the government is not so committed to developing renewable energy, and would not give up conventional energy options, especially nuclear energy.
At a summit on energy policy two weeks ago Ma said that “the nation’s renewable energy policy often faces a dilemma,” and “plans to build renewable energy-generating systems on land draw opposition from farmers, while creating sea-based power generation results in objections from fishermen.”
Although Ma told the Youth Policy Forum on Sunday that Taiwan is not in a position to give up any energy options, he spent a lot of time emphasizing the importance of nuclear energy and stressed that the nation should not give up developing nuclear energy.
If Ma is truly concerned about the “dilemma,” he will acknowledge that there are many more people — about 60 to 70 percent of respondents are against the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant in New Taipei City’s Gongliao District (貢寮) according to different opinion polls — opposed to nuclear energy than green energy, and those who may seem to be “opposed” to renewable energy facilities may not be truly opposed to them either.
Take for example residents in Yuanli Township (苑裡), Miaoli County, who are opposed to construction of a wind turbine project. They have repeatedly said that they are supportive of green energy projects, such as wind power. However, they are opposed to the decision to erect wind turbines too close to their homes — some as close as only 200m — especially when the decision was made without consulting them.
After a series of protests in the past few years, when the InfraVest Wind Power Group made concessions and agreed to take down the disputed turbines, the opposition just faded out.
Despite the promises, the government is not as fully committed to developing renewable energy as Ma says.
In 2010, with support from the Ministry of Economic Affairs, the Pingtung County Government turned many fish farms into solar panel “farms,” hoping to help increase the incomes of fish farmers, while encouraging renewable energy production.
However, fish farmers who happily welcomed the project became angry protesters when the ministry changed its mind and refused to purchase the electricity at the favorable price that it had previously agreed upon. This would not have happened if the government was really committed to developing and encouraging green energy.
On the other hand, when it comes to nuclear energy, the government is sparing no effort to preserve it.
Despite several defects discovered during test operations in the past few years, the government still approved moving ahead to the next stage of construction of the of the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant as long as Taiwan Power Co agreed to make improvements.
Facing an overwhelming public demand to cease construction of the plant, the government still decided to complete it and leave the public debating whether it should start operations in the future.
It is true that many countries are still using nuclear power as their primary source of energy, as Ma said. However, the small size of this nation and its high population density make it more dangerous for Taiwan to use nuclear energy, and that is the fundamental difference between Taiwan and other nations that are using nuclear power as their primary source of energy.
If Ma is sincerely committed to developing green energy, he should put as much effort into it as he does into promoting nuclear energy. Otherwise there are bound to be many problems stopping the progress in development of renewable energy sources in Taiwan.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing