President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) reiterated that the government is committed to developing forms of renewable energy, on Sunday, stressing that this is an era when people should not give up any energy options, but what he meant was that the government is not so committed to developing renewable energy, and would not give up conventional energy options, especially nuclear energy.
At a summit on energy policy two weeks ago Ma said that “the nation’s renewable energy policy often faces a dilemma,” and “plans to build renewable energy-generating systems on land draw opposition from farmers, while creating sea-based power generation results in objections from fishermen.”
Although Ma told the Youth Policy Forum on Sunday that Taiwan is not in a position to give up any energy options, he spent a lot of time emphasizing the importance of nuclear energy and stressed that the nation should not give up developing nuclear energy.
If Ma is truly concerned about the “dilemma,” he will acknowledge that there are many more people — about 60 to 70 percent of respondents are against the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant in New Taipei City’s Gongliao District (貢寮) according to different opinion polls — opposed to nuclear energy than green energy, and those who may seem to be “opposed” to renewable energy facilities may not be truly opposed to them either.
Take for example residents in Yuanli Township (苑裡), Miaoli County, who are opposed to construction of a wind turbine project. They have repeatedly said that they are supportive of green energy projects, such as wind power. However, they are opposed to the decision to erect wind turbines too close to their homes — some as close as only 200m — especially when the decision was made without consulting them.
After a series of protests in the past few years, when the InfraVest Wind Power Group made concessions and agreed to take down the disputed turbines, the opposition just faded out.
Despite the promises, the government is not as fully committed to developing renewable energy as Ma says.
In 2010, with support from the Ministry of Economic Affairs, the Pingtung County Government turned many fish farms into solar panel “farms,” hoping to help increase the incomes of fish farmers, while encouraging renewable energy production.
However, fish farmers who happily welcomed the project became angry protesters when the ministry changed its mind and refused to purchase the electricity at the favorable price that it had previously agreed upon. This would not have happened if the government was really committed to developing and encouraging green energy.
On the other hand, when it comes to nuclear energy, the government is sparing no effort to preserve it.
Despite several defects discovered during test operations in the past few years, the government still approved moving ahead to the next stage of construction of the of the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant as long as Taiwan Power Co agreed to make improvements.
Facing an overwhelming public demand to cease construction of the plant, the government still decided to complete it and leave the public debating whether it should start operations in the future.
It is true that many countries are still using nuclear power as their primary source of energy, as Ma said. However, the small size of this nation and its high population density make it more dangerous for Taiwan to use nuclear energy, and that is the fundamental difference between Taiwan and other nations that are using nuclear power as their primary source of energy.
If Ma is sincerely committed to developing green energy, he should put as much effort into it as he does into promoting nuclear energy. Otherwise there are bound to be many problems stopping the progress in development of renewable energy sources in Taiwan.
We are used to hearing that whenever something happens, it means Taiwan is about to fall to China. Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) cannot change the color of his socks without China experts claiming it means an invasion is imminent. So, it is no surprise that what happened in Venezuela over the weekend triggered the knee-jerk reaction of saying that Taiwan is next. That is not an opinion on whether US President Donald Trump was right to remove Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro the way he did or if it is good for Venezuela and the world. There are other, more qualified
The immediate response in Taiwan to the extraction of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro by the US over the weekend was to say that it was an example of violence by a major power against a smaller nation and that, as such, it gave Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) carte blanche to invade Taiwan. That assessment is vastly oversimplistic and, on more sober reflection, likely incorrect. Generally speaking, there are three basic interpretations from commentators in Taiwan. The first is that the US is no longer interested in what is happening beyond its own backyard, and no longer preoccupied with regions in other
Jan. 1 marks a decade since China repealed its one-child policy. Just 10 days before, Peng Peiyun (彭珮雲), who long oversaw the often-brutal enforcement of China’s family-planning rules, died at the age of 96, having never been held accountable for her actions. Obituaries praised Peng for being “reform-minded,” even though, in practice, she only perpetuated an utterly inhumane policy, whose consequences have barely begun to materialize. It was Vice Premier Chen Muhua (陳慕華) who first proposed the one-child policy in 1979, with the endorsement of China’s then-top leaders, Chen Yun (陳雲) and Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平), as a means of avoiding the
As technological change sweeps across the world, the focus of education has undergone an inevitable shift toward artificial intelligence (AI) and digital learning. However, the HundrED Global Collection 2026 report has a message that Taiwanese society and education policymakers would do well to reflect on. In the age of AI, the scarcest resource in education is not advanced computing power, but people; and the most urgent global educational crisis is not technological backwardness, but teacher well-being and retention. Covering 52 countries, the report from HundrED, a Finnish nonprofit that reviews and compiles innovative solutions in education from around the world, highlights a
RSS