President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) reiterated that the government is committed to developing forms of renewable energy, on Sunday, stressing that this is an era when people should not give up any energy options, but what he meant was that the government is not so committed to developing renewable energy, and would not give up conventional energy options, especially nuclear energy.
At a summit on energy policy two weeks ago Ma said that “the nation’s renewable energy policy often faces a dilemma,” and “plans to build renewable energy-generating systems on land draw opposition from farmers, while creating sea-based power generation results in objections from fishermen.”
Although Ma told the Youth Policy Forum on Sunday that Taiwan is not in a position to give up any energy options, he spent a lot of time emphasizing the importance of nuclear energy and stressed that the nation should not give up developing nuclear energy.
If Ma is truly concerned about the “dilemma,” he will acknowledge that there are many more people — about 60 to 70 percent of respondents are against the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant in New Taipei City’s Gongliao District (貢寮) according to different opinion polls — opposed to nuclear energy than green energy, and those who may seem to be “opposed” to renewable energy facilities may not be truly opposed to them either.
Take for example residents in Yuanli Township (苑裡), Miaoli County, who are opposed to construction of a wind turbine project. They have repeatedly said that they are supportive of green energy projects, such as wind power. However, they are opposed to the decision to erect wind turbines too close to their homes — some as close as only 200m — especially when the decision was made without consulting them.
After a series of protests in the past few years, when the InfraVest Wind Power Group made concessions and agreed to take down the disputed turbines, the opposition just faded out.
Despite the promises, the government is not as fully committed to developing renewable energy as Ma says.
In 2010, with support from the Ministry of Economic Affairs, the Pingtung County Government turned many fish farms into solar panel “farms,” hoping to help increase the incomes of fish farmers, while encouraging renewable energy production.
However, fish farmers who happily welcomed the project became angry protesters when the ministry changed its mind and refused to purchase the electricity at the favorable price that it had previously agreed upon. This would not have happened if the government was really committed to developing and encouraging green energy.
On the other hand, when it comes to nuclear energy, the government is sparing no effort to preserve it.
Despite several defects discovered during test operations in the past few years, the government still approved moving ahead to the next stage of construction of the of the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant as long as Taiwan Power Co agreed to make improvements.
Facing an overwhelming public demand to cease construction of the plant, the government still decided to complete it and leave the public debating whether it should start operations in the future.
It is true that many countries are still using nuclear power as their primary source of energy, as Ma said. However, the small size of this nation and its high population density make it more dangerous for Taiwan to use nuclear energy, and that is the fundamental difference between Taiwan and other nations that are using nuclear power as their primary source of energy.
If Ma is sincerely committed to developing green energy, he should put as much effort into it as he does into promoting nuclear energy. Otherwise there are bound to be many problems stopping the progress in development of renewable energy sources in Taiwan.
A gap appears to be emerging between Washington’s foreign policy elites and the broader American public on how the United States should respond to China’s rise. From my vantage working at a think tank in Washington, DC, and through regular travel around the United States, I increasingly experience two distinct discussions. This divergence — between America’s elite hawkishness and public caution — may become one of the least appreciated and most consequential external factors influencing Taiwan’s security environment in the years ahead. Within the American policy community, the dominant view of China has grown unmistakably tough. Many members of Congress, as
After declaring Iran’s military “gone,” US President Donald Trump appealed to the UK, France, Japan and South Korea — as well as China, Iran’s strategic partner — to send minesweepers and naval forces to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. When allies balked, the request turned into a warning: NATO would face “a very bad” future if it refused. The prevailing wisdom is that Trump faces a credibility problem: having spent years insulting allies, he finds they would not rally when he needs them. That is true, but superficial, as though a structural collapse could be caused by wounded feelings. Something
Former Taipei mayor and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) founding chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) was sentenced to 17 years in prison on Thursday, making headlines across major media. However, another case linked to the TPP — the indictment of Chinese immigrant Xu Chunying (徐春鶯) for alleged violations of the Anti-Infiltration Act (反滲透法) on Tuesday — has also stirred up heated discussions. Born in Shanghai, Xu became a resident of Taiwan through marriage in 1993. Currently the director of the Taiwan New Immigrant Development Association, she was elected to serve as legislator-at-large for the TPP in 2023, but was later charged with involvement
Out of 64 participating universities in this year’s Stars Program — through which schools directly recommend their top students to universities for admission — only 19 filled their admissions quotas. There were 922 vacancies, down more than 200 from last year; top universities had 37 unfilled places, 40 fewer than last year. The original purpose of the Stars Program was to expand admissions to a wider range of students. However, certain departments at elite universities that failed to meet their admissions quotas are not improving. Vacancies at top universities are linked to students’ program preferences on their applications, but inappropriate admission
RSS