The national happiness index — which measures the public’s degree of satisfaction with their wellbeing — shows that the nation is still ranked in the upper-middle tier among the 37 countries assessed. However, the latest assessment of general wellbeing among Taiwanese raises questions over whether a higher degree of satisfaction really reflects a higher degree of happiness and who should take heed of and respond to the index’s results — the general public or the government.
On Friday, the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) released its gross national happiness index for the year, with Taiwan taking 18th place among 34 countries in the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), plus Russia and Brazil. Last year, Taiwan ranked 19th.
This year, Taiwan was rated 6.93 out of 10 (with 10 being happiest) in the index, which evaluates people’s psychological and physical wellbeing using a variety of metrics in 11 categories. Closer analysis of these metrics shows that Taiwanese feel happiest about “income and wealth,” followed by “personal security,” “housing conditions” and “jobs and earnings,” with the lowest score being “environmental quality.”
DGBAS officials said the results show that Taiwan performs better for material living conditions than in quality of life as compared with the other countries in the study.
The government started the index last year, claiming its introduction is part of its efforts to better perceive public wellbeing and complement GDP data as a measure of Taiwan’s success. However, the findings this year say that Taiwanese are most happy about their income and wealth, despite people’s persistent concerns about stagnant salaries. How can this be? With worries about rising housing prices, decreasing spending power, pensions and fear of jobs being lost to overseas companies, real-world experience gives reason to doubt the index’s veracity.
Like last year, Taiwan’s overall score outdid Japan’s 6.24 and South Korea’s 5.41, and is higher than that of other Asian areas assessed. Hong Kong and Singapore, which are not OECD nations, were not part of the index. However, are Taiwanese generally happier than Japanese and South Koreans? Or is this just a government plan to fool people by telling them that their lives are not too bad given that Japan is ranked 22nd and South Korea 28th in the index?
As dubious as the index’s results might be, a more important question is: Will the government put the index at the heart of its policymaking? One does not need to chronicle the government’s day-to-day operations to recognize that official gaffes and policy flip-flops are among the many reasons for the public’s faith in lawmakers being shaken. After the release of last year’s index, the public’s anxiety over the government’s incompetence, inefficiency and chaotic policymaking has only increased, and there has been no substantial progress made by the government to improve wages, jobs or housing issues. By the government’s very nature, one can expect the same results this year.
People do not need a government that designs and measures a national happiness index for the sake of it. If the government is just trying to fool people by talking about a happiness index rather than being responsible and responsive, then it needs to be changed. It might pay to remind those entrusted with leadership that GNH stands for “gross national happiness,” not “government needs help.”
Weeks into the craze, nobody quite knows what to make of the OpenClaw mania sweeping China, marked by viral photos of retirees lining up for installation events and users gathering in red claw hats. The queues and cosplay inspired by the “raising a lobster” trend make for irresistible China clickbait. However, the West is fixating on the least important part of the story. As a consumer craze, OpenClaw — the AI agent designed to do tasks on a user’s behalf — would likely burn out. Without some developer background, it is too glitchy and technically awkward for true mainstream adoption,
Out of 64 participating universities in this year’s Stars Program — through which schools directly recommend their top students to universities for admission — only 19 filled their admissions quotas. There were 922 vacancies, down more than 200 from last year; top universities had 37 unfilled places, 40 fewer than last year. The original purpose of the Stars Program was to expand admissions to a wider range of students. However, certain departments at elite universities that failed to meet their admissions quotas are not improving. Vacancies at top universities are linked to students’ program preferences on their applications, but inappropriate admission
On Monday, a group of bipartisan US senators arrived in Taiwan to support the nation’s special defense bill to counter Chinese threats. At the same time, Beijing announced that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) had invited Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) to visit China, a move to make the KMT a pawn in its proxy warfare against Taiwan and the US. Since her inauguration as KMT chair last year, Cheng, widely seen as a pro-China figure, has made no secret of her desire to interact with the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and meet with Xi, naming it a
Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) took the stage at a protest rally on Sunday in front of the Presidential Office Building in Taipei in support of former TPP chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲), who has been sentenced to 17 years in jail for corruption and embezzlement. Huang told the crowd that Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) had sent a message of support the previous day, saying she would be traveling from the south to Taipei: If the protest continued into the evening, she had said, she would show up. The rally was due to end
RSS