The national happiness index — which measures the public’s degree of satisfaction with their wellbeing — shows that the nation is still ranked in the upper-middle tier among the 37 countries assessed. However, the latest assessment of general wellbeing among Taiwanese raises questions over whether a higher degree of satisfaction really reflects a higher degree of happiness and who should take heed of and respond to the index’s results — the general public or the government.
On Friday, the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) released its gross national happiness index for the year, with Taiwan taking 18th place among 34 countries in the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), plus Russia and Brazil. Last year, Taiwan ranked 19th.
This year, Taiwan was rated 6.93 out of 10 (with 10 being happiest) in the index, which evaluates people’s psychological and physical wellbeing using a variety of metrics in 11 categories. Closer analysis of these metrics shows that Taiwanese feel happiest about “income and wealth,” followed by “personal security,” “housing conditions” and “jobs and earnings,” with the lowest score being “environmental quality.”
DGBAS officials said the results show that Taiwan performs better for material living conditions than in quality of life as compared with the other countries in the study.
The government started the index last year, claiming its introduction is part of its efforts to better perceive public wellbeing and complement GDP data as a measure of Taiwan’s success. However, the findings this year say that Taiwanese are most happy about their income and wealth, despite people’s persistent concerns about stagnant salaries. How can this be? With worries about rising housing prices, decreasing spending power, pensions and fear of jobs being lost to overseas companies, real-world experience gives reason to doubt the index’s veracity.
Like last year, Taiwan’s overall score outdid Japan’s 6.24 and South Korea’s 5.41, and is higher than that of other Asian areas assessed. Hong Kong and Singapore, which are not OECD nations, were not part of the index. However, are Taiwanese generally happier than Japanese and South Koreans? Or is this just a government plan to fool people by telling them that their lives are not too bad given that Japan is ranked 22nd and South Korea 28th in the index?
As dubious as the index’s results might be, a more important question is: Will the government put the index at the heart of its policymaking? One does not need to chronicle the government’s day-to-day operations to recognize that official gaffes and policy flip-flops are among the many reasons for the public’s faith in lawmakers being shaken. After the release of last year’s index, the public’s anxiety over the government’s incompetence, inefficiency and chaotic policymaking has only increased, and there has been no substantial progress made by the government to improve wages, jobs or housing issues. By the government’s very nature, one can expect the same results this year.
People do not need a government that designs and measures a national happiness index for the sake of it. If the government is just trying to fool people by talking about a happiness index rather than being responsible and responsive, then it needs to be changed. It might pay to remind those entrusted with leadership that GNH stands for “gross national happiness,” not “government needs help.”
A 50-year-old on Wednesday last week died while under anesthesia at a Taipei cosmetic clinic shortly after undergoing a penis enlargement procedure. The surgeon was arrested for suspected medical malpractice, again bringing to the surface shortcomings in the regulation of cosmetic medicine. Media reports said the clinic owner and surgeon, surnamed Ting (丁), was previously convicted of negligent homicide for a postsurgical death and had been charged with coercion and aggravated assault after allegedly stopping a patient from calling for an ambulance. He had also been fined for failing inspections and had allegedly permitted people without medical licenses to assist
It was most annoying last week to read Chairman Xi Jinping’s (習近平) fulsome encomium to the People’s Liberation Army during the Eightieth Anniversary celebrations of victory over Japan in World War II. Comrade Xi’s soaring rhetoric was stuffed with “martyrs, sacrifice, solemnity and unwavering resolve” in praise of the “Chinese People’s War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression and the World Anti-Fascist War.” His aspirations overflowed with “world peace” and love of the United Nations, of which China is a founding member. The Liberation Army Daily said that every word from General Secretary Xi Jinping “resounded in his powerful voice, illuminating the
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) will stop at nothing to weaken Taiwan’s sovereignty, going as far as to create complete falsehoods. That the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has never ruled Taiwan is an objective fact. To refute this, Beijing has tried to assert “jurisdiction” over Taiwan, pointing to its military exercises around the nation as “proof.” That is an outright lie: If the PRC had jurisdiction over Taiwan, it could simply have issued decrees. Instead, it needs to perform a show of force around the nation to demonstrate its fantasy. Its actions prove the exact opposite of its assertions. A
An American Institute in Taiwan (AIT) spokesperson on Saturday rebuked a Chinese official for mischaracterizing World War II-era agreements as proving that Taiwan was ceded to China. The US Department of State later affirmed that the AIT remarks reflect Washington’s long-standing position: Taiwan’s political status remains undetermined and should only be resolved peacefully. The US would continue supporting Taiwan against military, economic, legal and diplomatic pressure from China, and opposes any unilateral attempt to alter the “status quo,” particularly through coercion or force, the United Daily News cited the department as saying. The remarks followed Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs
RSS