The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) both promote their own interpretations of China.
After China was divided into two in 1949, the terms “nationalist spy” and “communist spy” — before that, the latter were called “bandit spies” — became accusations that the two sides hurled at each other, sometimes even resulting in execution.
This situation does not appear to have changed very much. The KMT and the CCP might appear to be getting along fine, but the two sides continue to aim their military deployments at each other, and they still treat each other as spies.
In Taiwan, the Mainland Affairs Council is using the Straits Exchange Foundation as its intermediary when dealing with “Communist China,” and in China, the Taiwan Affairs Office is using the Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Straits (ARATS) as its go-between when dealing with nationalist China.
Both sides have ulterior motives: China wants the death of “Nationalist China” and to regain control over the whole of “China.” The KMT frequently begs for favors while at the same time fearing getting hurt. The two are fighting the same enemy: the efforts to transform Taiwan into a normalized country.
Historically speaking, Nationalist China and the CCP are a pretty pair. This particular juxtaposition is the result of the KMT’s occupation of Taiwan, which, with the help of the US’ Cold War front line, divided the two sides along the Taiwan Strait and allowed the KMT to remain in Taiwan.
China is the People’s Republic of China (PRC), and Nationalist China is the remaining fragment of a fiction that remains in Taiwan, the China that the KMT sees as its lifeblood and the China that could help the KMT contain a Taiwan that longs for independence in the place of China.
This plan is, in fact, not at all helpful to the party-state forces that fled China for Taiwan, although this is not what these party-state elites are thinking.
To them, Taiwan is of great benefit as an important bargaining chip. The KMT, which has so fundamentally monopolized government power, thinks that as long as it keeps wearing the China hat, the CCP will let it rule in its place and control this “quasi-nation” that only wants to be rescued from China, any China, nationalist or communist.
One Nationalist China official who doubled as foundation secretary-general and council deputy minister was suddenly accused of being a Chinese “communist bandit.”
Communist China calls all the shots today, and no one listens to Nationalist China. If you want to catch a communist spy, there are plenty of retired officials and generals hiding behind every corner in China.
There are no benefits left for them in Taiwan, so now they are making their fortunes in China. Talking of which, it is about time that President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) told us what his plans are.
Lee Min-yung is a poet.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past