The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) both promote their own interpretations of China.
After China was divided into two in 1949, the terms “nationalist spy” and “communist spy” — before that, the latter were called “bandit spies” — became accusations that the two sides hurled at each other, sometimes even resulting in execution.
This situation does not appear to have changed very much. The KMT and the CCP might appear to be getting along fine, but the two sides continue to aim their military deployments at each other, and they still treat each other as spies.
In Taiwan, the Mainland Affairs Council is using the Straits Exchange Foundation as its intermediary when dealing with “Communist China,” and in China, the Taiwan Affairs Office is using the Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Straits (ARATS) as its go-between when dealing with nationalist China.
Both sides have ulterior motives: China wants the death of “Nationalist China” and to regain control over the whole of “China.” The KMT frequently begs for favors while at the same time fearing getting hurt. The two are fighting the same enemy: the efforts to transform Taiwan into a normalized country.
Historically speaking, Nationalist China and the CCP are a pretty pair. This particular juxtaposition is the result of the KMT’s occupation of Taiwan, which, with the help of the US’ Cold War front line, divided the two sides along the Taiwan Strait and allowed the KMT to remain in Taiwan.
China is the People’s Republic of China (PRC), and Nationalist China is the remaining fragment of a fiction that remains in Taiwan, the China that the KMT sees as its lifeblood and the China that could help the KMT contain a Taiwan that longs for independence in the place of China.
This plan is, in fact, not at all helpful to the party-state forces that fled China for Taiwan, although this is not what these party-state elites are thinking.
To them, Taiwan is of great benefit as an important bargaining chip. The KMT, which has so fundamentally monopolized government power, thinks that as long as it keeps wearing the China hat, the CCP will let it rule in its place and control this “quasi-nation” that only wants to be rescued from China, any China, nationalist or communist.
One Nationalist China official who doubled as foundation secretary-general and council deputy minister was suddenly accused of being a Chinese “communist bandit.”
Communist China calls all the shots today, and no one listens to Nationalist China. If you want to catch a communist spy, there are plenty of retired officials and generals hiding behind every corner in China.
There are no benefits left for them in Taiwan, so now they are making their fortunes in China. Talking of which, it is about time that President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) told us what his plans are.
Lee Min-yung is a poet.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers