The death toll caused by the series of gas explosions in Greater Kaohsiung last Thursday night has reached 30, with 310 people injured. The disaster has forced Taiwan to reconsider the city’s position as an industrial center; built on a spiderweb of petrochemical pipelines, many of its residential areas sit on top of a ticking time bomb.
In 1997, a propene leak at the city’s Jhensing Bridge resulted in an explosion that killed 14 people and injured dozens, but the central and local governments did not learn from this incident.
The area might have been uninhabited when the pipelines were laid, but the subsequent decision to allow residential development in the area was a mistake, which was further aggravated by allowing underground water culverts to intersect petrochemical pipelines, increasing the rate of corrosion and wear on the pipelines.
These pipelines had not been managed for a long time prior to the explosions, because the central and local governments were arguing over who was responsible for their maintenance.
LCY Chemical Corp chairman Bowei Lee (李謀偉) says that the pipelines have been maintained on a regular basis by state-run CPC Corp, Taiwan (CPC), which CPC denies. If LCY Chemical’s pipelines have not been inspected, maintained and repaired on a regular basis, that raises questions about other petrochemical plants.
Following previous major disasters, such as the 921 Earthquake or Typhoon Morakot, the government had issued special regulations and special budgets to handle post-disaster reconstruction, and established dedicated agencies to handle post-disaster relief, housing and reconstruction efforts.
Now, however, the government has said that there will be “no special budget, no special regulations and no special agency” in Greater Kaohsiung.
This divergent treatment has drawn strong protests from Greater Kaohsiung legislators of both the ruling and opposition parties.
The Cabinet’s “three noes” policy is a political decision taken with the Nov. 29 nine-in-one elections in mind.
The time that elapsed between the propene leak being reported and it being dealt with, and communications with the concerned companies must be investigated. Despite this, Kaohsiung Mayor Chen Chu (陳菊) of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has acted efficiently and tirelessly, leaving little cause for ill-feeling among the disaster victims.
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) does not want to provide the city with funds and manpower in the run-up to the elections, as it would only improve Chen’s current lead. Thus, the party wants to withhold aid and use dissatisfaction among the disaster victims to influence the elections and bring Chen down.
Deputy Minister of Economic Affairs Woody Duh (杜紫軍) said that responsibility for the disaster should be assigned to “whoever approved, receives money and manages” the pipelines.
Vice President Wu Den-yih (吳敦義) approved the laying of the pipelines; the petrochemical industry pays NT$110 billion (US$3.6 billion) in taxes every year, but most of that goes to the central government, which only redistributes part of it to Greater Kaohsiung; and the central and local governments are still arguing over who should be in charge of managing the pipelines.
The central government should pay more for the disaster than Greater Kaohsiung, which has long suffered from the air and water pollution and the industrial risks caused by the petrochemical industry, negatively impacting the city’s development. The advantages of industrial development have been hijacked by Taipei and the central government.
Therefore, the post-disaster work should address the issue of bringing justice, in terms of economic development, to Greater Kaohsiung.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers