Pope Francis has recently launched a string of attacks on capitalism and the effect economic globalization has had on global society. For him, global capitalism has caused the world to descend into blind idolatry of money, leading to a disposable consumerist culture and a “new tyranny” in which money is given precedence to the exclusion of all else. This distorted economic system is not only responsible for high youth unemployment, and indeed for sacrificing the entire younger generation, but has created social inequality, poverty and injustice, he said.
The pope has said that, with the way the economy is allowed to operate at the moment, it is effectively killing people.
From where does this problem with global capitalism arise?
In his On the Jewish Question, Karl Marx wrote that “Money is the jealous god of Israel, in face of which no other god may exist.” The quote would not be out of place if you substituted the word “Israel” for “neoliberalism.”
Human society is multifaceted and admits to many different forms of behavior. There is religious and cultural behavior, and economic behavior is merely another facet of human activity, of which the objective — as the 1998 Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences winner Amartya Sen describes in his book Development as Freedom — is the search for human freedom and dignity.
However, under neoliberal thinking economic development is placed above all else, becoming the highest principle and ultimate goal of all human activity, and this is why we find ourselves facing our current predicament. This form of economic system, reigned over by the “jealous money god,” has also had a serious impact on Taiwan, leading to a burgeoning wealth disparity and towering youth unemployment.
However, compared with the waves of discontent targeted at global capitalism elsewhere, the policies of the government under President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) have continued to follow neoliberal logic: Whether it be establishing free economic pilot zones or signing cross-strait agreements on trade in services or goods, these policies are informed by neoliberal thinking and the need to strive for ever more liberalization.
As the government tries to push these policies, all we hear are empty sound bites about how the economy will only be saved by more liberalization and more deregulation, otherwise we will “be losers in the international race.”
However, despite the government’s attempts to brainwash us, it has failed to produce any reliable scientific figures to prove that these policies have any hope of actually solving the problems of inequality, poverty or injustice that the pope has identified as fatal.
The pope can no longer stand by without speaking out about politicians’ unwillingness to take responsibility for the situation and an economic system that kills. The Ma administration, on the other hand, remains aloof and indifferent to the plight of others.
Is it not now incumbent on the younger generation of this nation, the group most affected by the government’s ruinous economic policies, to stand up and say “enough is enough,” and revolt?
Allen Houng is a professor at National Yang-Ming University’s Institute of Philosophy of Mind and Cognition.
Translated by Paul Cooper
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past