One evening last week, a group of people set out to walk along a disused railway in Jerusalem, now a pleasant path through the south of the city. They were mostly families, some with their dogs, some pushing strollers. Among them was David Broza, one of Israel’s best-loved musicians.
They carried no banners and chanted no slogans, but the message of their small demonstration — their fourth in recent weeks — was clear from their T-shirts.
In black lettering on white cloth, the words in both Hebrew and Arabic read: “We march together, hand in hand.”
Most of the group of about 200 were connected to a school at the starting point of their walk. The Hand in Hand school is unique in Jerusalem for being a mixed bilingual establishment of Jewish and Palestinian children and staff, with a strong ethos of coexistence and peace. It is one of just five such schools in Israel; all others are segregated.
Maya Frankforter, a Jewish parent, said the school community had decided on the marches to protest at the violence that erupted in Jerusalem following the murders of three Jewish youths and a Palestinian teenager last month and the ensuing horror in Gaza.
She said the demonstrations were “like an island of strength, because I’ve been feeling suffocated, hopeless and helpless. This empowers me.”
Palestinian teacher Widad Naoum said she, too, drew comfort and strength from the protests.
“People see me as the enemy. Every day, they point the finger at me. They judge me because I am Arab, no matter what I think or do,” she said.
The demonstrators soon encountered opposition from a handful of youths, who shouted “traitors” and “go back to Gaza.” On previous marches, women protesters have had the words “bitch” and “whore” screamed in their faces. The parents do their best to shield the children from the abuse.
The picture has been repeated in many cities in Israel in recent weeks. Protests against the bloodshed in Gaza have attracted much smaller numbers than in previous conflicts, in a reflection of the diminishing weight of the “peace camp” in Israeli society.
The previous weekend, protesters in the northern city of Haifa were assaulted by right-wing activists, who beat up the Arab deputy mayor and his son. Police have been forced to protect a series of peace marches in Tel Aviv, including one on July 19 that was pelted with eggs and plastic bottles. A public reading of ex-soldiers’ testimonies about their roles in previous conflicts in Gaza, organized by Breaking the Silence, a group of veteran combatants dedicated to exposing military injustices, was barracked by up to 100 extremists.
It is a big contrast with the 400,000 people — then almost a tenth of the country’s population — who took to the streets in 1986 to protest about Israel’s war in Lebanon.
In 1995, 100,000 people attended the rally in support of the Oslo Accords, at which former Israeli prime minister Yitzhak Rabin was assassinated. Also, in 2009, several thousand people joined peace marches during Operation Cast Lead, Israel’s three-week military assault on Gaza.
Since the start of the current conflict in Gaza, protests have generally attracted a few hundred people, with the July 19th march in Tel Aviv mustering about 1,000 supporters. After another week of carnage, activists were hoping for a bigger number to demonstrate in the city on Friday last week.
The reasons for the decline of Israel’s peace movement are, inevitably, complex and interrelated. They include the failures of the Oslo Accords and of successive attempts to forge a peace deal between Israel and the Palestinians; the growing voice of the extreme right in Israeli politics; the “normalization” of the 47-year-long occupation; and the relative marginalization of the Palestinian cause, both in Israel and internationally.
Added to that mix is weariness and hopelessness.
“I think the peace movement became frustrated that nothing changes,” said Maayan Dak of the Women’s Coalition for Peace. “Things just repeat. People feel there is no point.”
According to Tamar Hermann, author of The Israeli Peace Movement: A Shattered Dream, the decline of the Israeli peace camp began in the aftermath of the 1993 Oslo Accords.
“Most people felt the government was now taking care of the matter; they could do other things,” she said. “And when they realized Oslo wasn’t working, they still didn’t want to protest for fear they would inadvertently be joining forces with the [anti-Oslo] right wing.”
Other factors she identifies as contributing to the peace camp’s contraction include the second intifada, or Palestinian uprising — “when buses are exploding in the street, it’s hard to call for peace” — and the shifts in Israeli politics over recent years.
Uprisings elsewhere in the Middle East, and the increasing focus on the Iranian nuclear threat, pushed the Palestinian cause to the margins.
“The Palestinians were not perceived as a strategic threat to Israel’s national security,” Hermann said. “People started to believe that they could go on living this for many years. The peace camp was looked on as anachronistic.”
Other Israelis cite the new threat they feel from rockets now threatening major population centers, and the threat of militants using tunnels to infiltrate Israeli settlements, possibly to grab hostages and smuggle them back into Gaza.
Meanwhile, the Israeli right wing has become ever more strident. A political culture of antagonism towards and discrimination against Israeli Arabs, who make up 20 percent of the population, hostility to human rights organizations and defenders of Palestinian rights, and racism against immigrants and refugees has fueled extremism, according to activists on the left.
“Politicians have given legitimacy to extremism. Right-wing violence does not come out of nowhere,” Dak said.
Frankforter added: “The atmosphere in Jerusalem, and Israel as a whole, is very scary. I never felt fear before. I felt frustrated and isolated in previous wars, but never physical fear. People are frightened to speak out. Something is broken in Israel.”
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers