The Hong Kong Journalists Association (HKJA) recently published its annual report for this year, Press Freedom Under Siege. The opening sentence of the report says that “[t]he year under review has been the darkest for press freedom for several decades...” This is something fellow journalists in Taiwan can empathize with.
In her 2007 book, Media in Hong Kong: Press freedom and political change, 1967-2005, Carol Lai (黎佩兒) gives a detailed description of the self-censorship process in Hong Kong media in about 1997. She says that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) used a carrot-and-stick strategy to greatly reduce advertising revenue for disobedient media outlets, even causing them to close down. The result was that the media did not dare criticize China.
The situation described in the book is still alive and well today: In this year and last year alone, former Ming Pao chief editor Kevin Lau (劉進圖) was attacked and stabbed, talk-show host Li Wei-ling (李慧玲) was sacked by Commercial Radio Hong Kong, advertisers turned away from Apple Daily and am730, another Chinese-language publication, and the Hong Kong government refused to issue free licenses to the Hong Kong Television Network. Even Ming Pao had to change its July 1 headline “Demonstration for universal suffrage biggest in decades” by removing “for universal suffrage.” Chinese officials increased the pressure by “instructing” Hong Kong media to be “rational and objective,” and to report positively on the Chinese economy, among other things.
According to Reporters Without Borders’ Press Freedom Index for this year, Hong Kong has dropped from 18th place in the world 12 years ago to 61st place this year.
On June 22, Bloomberg View published a column with the title “Is This the Death of Hong Kong?” in which the author William Pesek stated that “Hong Kong has nothing to learn from Beijing,” a case in point being the diametrical opposition between press freedom and news censorship — China’s press freedom is pretty much the worst in the world, ranking 175th of 180 in the Press Freedom Index.
Taiwan is not much better off. After the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) returned to power, Taiwan’s press freedom ranking has dropped to No. 50 due to government interference and pro-Chinese media outlets. One good example of this is that most Taiwanese media outlets have not commented on the HKJA’s latest annual report.
The values, lifestyles and level of democratization in Hong Kong and Taiwan differ vastly from China. Taiwan and Hong Kong are close, and seeing the problems facing Hong Kong, the “Pearl of the East,” people in these two places should bring their intelligence and moral courage into cooperation with other democracies and friends to form a technological network to keep everyone informed.
Media circles in particular need to work together and connect with democracy activists in China and social activists in China, Taiwan and Hong Kong, so that they can meet the CCP’s propaganda and sycophantic “red media outlets” head-on by opposing China’s “united front” strategy and brainwashing attempts.
They should even be able to take the initiative by contacting international media outlets and organizations to provide dynamic information about the freedom of expression in Taiwan and Hong Kong in order to build international sympathy and support.
If we do not do something, it might not be long before the next Bloomberg column is titled “Is This the Death of Taiwan?”
Lu I-ming is a former publisher and president of the Taiwan Shin Sheng Daily News.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers