On Thursday last week, Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) visited the Republic of Korea (ROK) for the first time since taking office.
China Central Television broadcast glowing reports about Xi’s invitation to South Korean President Park Geun-hye to organize a joint commemoration of the 70th anniversary of the war of resistance against Japan next year.
The two sides talked glibly about their desire to build a spiritual union of joint resistance to Japan, based on “a correct understanding of history,” but in fact, they are distorting the historical truth. This ruse can be exposed by asking one simple question: Did Korea really resist Japan?
Korea’s modern history can be compared to what happened in France during World War II.
Even though Nazi Germany occupied Paris, the government of Marshal Philippe Petain remained the legal government of France after moving its capital to Vichy.
However, Charles de Gaulle and others went to London and established the Free French Forces, which contributed to the Allies’ struggle against the Axis powers.
At first, the Free French Forces only served to make a political rallying cry and did not even amount to a government in exile. However, as the world situation changed, they eventually became recognized as the legal government of France.
In 1910, the Korean Empire, which had been a vassal state of China, signed a treaty with the Empire of Japan that merged the two empires into one.
The Korean royal family was absorbed into that of Japan. Japan was the successor state, and the Korean Peninsula became part of the Japanese empire, enjoying equal status with its other territories.
From then on, and notwithstanding the undeclared war that Japan waged on China from 1937 onward and its 1941 sneak attack on the US Navy base at Pearl Harbor, Korean subjects not only paid taxes to Japan, but also contributed to Japan’s Pacific War by serving in its armed forces. There were even Korean voluntary units in the Japanese military, and Koreans such as Crown Prince Euimin and Hong Sa-ik reached ranks as high as lieutenant general.
All ROK army chiefs of staff from 1948 to 1969 were former officers of the Japanese army, and the same is true of former ROK president Park Chung-hee.
Japan was the lawful government of the whole of Korea during World War II.
Considering these historical realities, what position is South Korea in to commemorate the anti-Japanese war?
Another aspect to consider is that a group of Korean nationalists set up a “Provisional Government of the Republic of Korea” in Shanghai in 1919.
On Oct. 10, 1938, the Korean Liberation Army (KLA) was set up in Wuhan, China. This force operated under the authority of the Political Training Board of China’s National Military Council, which also supplied its provisions.
In 1940, the Chinese Nationalist government based in Chongqing decided to provide assistance to the Korean provisional government and placed the KLA directly under the authority of China’s National Military Council, while the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) dispatched military and political officers to guide its operations.
Following World War II, the ROK established a government and set up an independent state with the US’ backing.
Considering its history of dependence on China and the US, what justification does South Korea have for its claimed tradition of anti-Japanese resistance?
South Korea is not the only place where peripheral sinocentric thinking obscures historical reality. Taiwan’s governing authorities are holding an exhibition in the Zhongshan Hall — the former Taipei city hall — to mark the anniversaries of the 1937 Marco Polo Bridge Incident — China’s victory in its war of resistance against Japan — and Taiwan’s “retrocession” to China from Japanese colonial rule. The exhibition glorifies resistance and martyrdom, and it embodies the outlook of a victor nation. Since its real purpose is political mobilization, it cannot be expected to present a fair account of historical facts.
The historical reality is that, from 1895 onward, Taiwan was legally a territory of the Empire of Japan. Taiwanese people were imperial subjects who contributed to Japan’s war effort in the Pacific.
From a juridical point of view, Taiwanese people were all on the losing side in the Pacific War. Taiwan’s fate at the end of the war was to be cut off from Japan and occupied by the Allied forces, and its status remains undecided to this day.
Telling people to have a correct understanding of history on the one hand while stealthily distorting history on the other is just the kind of shameful behavior one can expect from hack politicians.
HoonTing is a political commentator.
Translated by Julian Clegg
A foreign colleague of mine asked me recently, “What is a safe distance from potential People’s Liberation Army (PLA) Rocket Force’s (PLARF) Taiwan targets?” This article will answer this question and help people living in Taiwan have a deeper understanding of the threat. Why is it important to understand PLA/PLARF targeting strategy? According to RAND analysis, the PLA’s “systems destruction warfare” focuses on crippling an adversary’s operational system by targeting its networks, especially leadership, command and control (C2) nodes, sensors, and information hubs. Admiral Samuel Paparo, commander of US Indo-Pacific Command, noted in his 15 May 2025 Sedona Forum keynote speech that, as
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) last week announced that the KMT was launching “Operation Patriot” in response to an unprecedented massive campaign to recall 31 KMT legislators. However, his action has also raised questions and doubts: Are these so-called “patriots” pledging allegiance to the country or to the party? While all KMT-proposed campaigns to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) lawmakers have failed, and a growing number of local KMT chapter personnel have been indicted for allegedly forging petition signatures, media reports said that at least 26 recall motions against KMT legislators have passed the second signature threshold
The Central Election Commission (CEC) on Friday announced that recall motions targeting 24 Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers and Hsinchu Mayor Ann Kao (高虹安) have been approved, and that a recall vote would take place on July 26. Of the recall motions against 35 KMT legislators, 31 were reviewed by the CEC after they exceeded the second-phase signature thresholds. Twenty-four were approved, five were asked to submit additional signatures to make up for invalid ones and two are still being reviewed. The mass recall vote targeting so many lawmakers at once is unprecedented in Taiwan’s political history. If the KMT loses more
Taiwan’s unconditional support “for all legitimate and necessary actions taken by the government of India to safeguard national security and fight terrorist forces that cross borders to attack innocent civilians” marked a monumental shift in the relationship between Taipei and New Delhi. At a time when the Indian government sent several delegations of parliament members to convey to the rest of the world Pakistan’s role in sponsoring terrorism against India, Taiwan became one of the few nations that unequivocally supported India’s military operation, “Sindhoor.” Sure, this change in bilateral ties did not happen in a vacuum. Over the past decade,
RSS