After Britain’s lease on Hong Kong expired in 1997, the territory was returned to China. Seventeen years ago, a great historical ruse was exposed as the “one country, two systems” policy turned out to mean that China intended to swallow Hong Kong lock, stock and barrel.
This event was reminiscent of the situation in Taiwan on Aug. 15, 1945, after World War II had ended, when Taiwanese with no thought of independence or sovereignty and feeling that they were Chinese compatriots, were looking forward to the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and its version of China to take over, without knowing if that would be good or bad.
Less than 20 months later, on Feb. 28, 1947, they had their answer. There was heavy suffering and no one was there to help.
Now, despite working so hard in pursuit of democracy, all the nation has is a government that is too gutless to run the dictatorship it seems to want and too intolerant to accept the diversity of democracy.
Hong Kong was returned to the People’s Republic of China, the successor government of the Republic of China and the Qing Dynasty, because Britain’s lease on the colony had expired. The difference between Hong Kong in 1997 and Taiwan 52 years earlier was that Hong Kongers were very clear on the fact that things could go really bad.
Most of the intellectuals and economically powerful people had British citizenship. Furthermore, due to globalization and information transparency, the whole world has been watching in detail what has actually been happening in Hong Kong under the “one country, two systems” policy.
People in Hong Kong were not eliminated, like the intellectuals and economically powerful people in Taiwan, instead they were left alone and without assistance.
After the KMT occupied Taiwan, bringing with it its nationalist version of China, less than 20 months passed before the 228 Incident occurred. Seventeen years after Hong Kong was returned to China, they were hit by a Chinese white paper, The Practice of the ‘One Country, Two Systems’ Policy in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. Hong Kong’s democracy movement mobilized and the situation began to resemble the situation in Taiwan during the Incident, when Taiwanese were demanding increased autonomy. However, judging from the opinion of observers, communist China will not relent on its tough approach.
China might have ousted the KMT through social revolution, but there is no difference in how it uses its power.
The essence of its Chineseness is disconnected from the Chineseness that Taiwanese cast off during Japan’s colonial rule, as well as the Chineseness that Hong Kongers cast off under British rule. Both Nationalist and Communist China want nothing more than to rid Taiwan and Hong Kong of their non-Chineseness.
What democracy? What freedom?
China is all about me, myself and I. The same is true of the blue revolution in Taiwan and the red revolution in China. They have internalized the will to resort to might and armed force.
Even today, in the 21st century, their heads are chock-full of ideas about celestial empires.
This is precisely why Nationalist China and Communist China have ran into problems with Taiwan and Hong Kong.
History has left traces in the present and the present reflects history. It is just that Hong Kong and Macau are in China, and Taiwan is not.
Lee Min-yung is a poet.
Translated by Perry Svensson
A series of strong earthquakes in Hualien County not only caused severe damage in Taiwan, but also revealed that China’s power has permeated everywhere. A Taiwanese woman posted on the Internet that she found clips of the earthquake — which were recorded by the security camera in her home — on the Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu. It is spine-chilling that the problem might be because the security camera was manufactured in China. China has widely collected information, infringed upon public privacy and raised information security threats through various social media platforms, as well as telecommunication and security equipment. Several former TikTok employees revealed
For the incoming Administration of President-elect William Lai (賴清德), successfully deterring a Chinese Communist Party (CCP) attack or invasion of democratic Taiwan over his four-year term would be a clear victory. But it could also be a curse, because during those four years the CCP’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) will grow far stronger. As such, increased vigilance in Washington and Taipei will be needed to ensure that already multiplying CCP threat trends don’t overwhelm Taiwan, the United States, and their democratic allies. One CCP attempt to overwhelm was announced on April 19, 2024, namely that the PLA had erred in combining major missions
The Constitutional Court on Tuesday last week held a debate over the constitutionality of the death penalty. The issue of the retention or abolition of the death penalty often involves the conceptual aspects of social values and even religious philosophies. As it is written in The Federalist Papers by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison and John Jay, the government’s policy is often a choice between the lesser of two evils or the greater of two goods, and it is impossible to be perfect. Today’s controversy over the retention or abolition of the death penalty can be viewed in the same way. UNACCEPTABLE Viewing the
At the same time as more than 30 military aircraft were detected near Taiwan — one of the highest daily incursions this year — with some flying as close as 37 nautical miles (69kms) from the northern city of Keelung, China announced a limited and selected relaxation of restrictions on Taiwanese agricultural exports and tourism, upon receiving a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) delegation led by KMT legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅崑萁). This demonstrates the two-faced gimmick of China’s “united front” strategy. Despite the strongest earthquake to hit the nation in 25 years striking Hualien on April 3, which caused