Six years after President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) entered office, Taiwanese have realized that Ma has a bizarre sense of justice, historical understanding and foreign policy direction, as well as a distorted national pride.
In a long list of diplomatic incidents during the past six years, the embattled president has always tried to deflect public scrutiny about his weaknesses and incompetence in domestic affairs by resorting to hawkish positions and disproportionate measures against other countries.
This approach has resulted in two effects. First, Ma has been temporarily able to shake off his weak image and improve his dire approval ratings. Second, public attention has shifted from domestic policy failures to international affairs, particularly if nationalist sentiment is running high at the time.
No example is more evident than the dispute between Taiwan and Japan over the National Palace Museum exhibitions in Tokyo and Kyushu.
Some exhibition posters bore the title “Palace Museum, Taipei,” to refer to the National Palace Museum, omitting the word “national.” Ma described the Tokyo museum’s handling of the exhibition as “unacceptable,” instructing all offending posters to be replaced and the exhibition to be postponed.
First lady Chow Mei-ching’s (周美青) scheduled visit to Japan, during which she was to attend the opening of the exhibition, was subsequently postponed.
While the posters in question were made by a media sponsors group controlling the Asahi Shimbun and other media outlets, rather than the Tokyo museum, the Ma administration insisted that Japan had “hurt the feeling of the Taiwanese” and something has to be done, in much the same way that Beijing told Japan the feelings of Chinese had been hurt on issues regarding the Japanese Imperial Army’s atrocities prior to and during World War II.
The same resolution and iron-fisted policy can also be seen in Taiwan’s maritime conflict with Japan over the Diaoyutai Islands (釣魚台), which the nation claims, in which Taiwan sent Coast Guard Administration vessels to confront the Japanese Coast Guard.
In Taiwan’s row with the Philippines over its coast guard personnel shooting and killing a Taiwanese fisherman last year, Ma recalled Taiwan’s representative to Manila, froze the hiring of Philippine migrant workers and levied a series of sanctions at Manila, saying that the Philippines must offer a sincere apology or else the incident “would never end.”
Ma can earn the respect of Taiwanese if he acts as aggressively in the face of never-ending challenges from the country most hostile to Taiwan — China.
While he has guarded the word “national” like the last oasis in the desert against Japan, when it comes to Beijing, he accepts being referred to as “mister,” rather than “president,” and prohibits the display of national flags during Chinese officials’ visits.
Ma has said that a proposed meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) at an APEC summit in their capacities as “leaders of economies,” rather than heads of state, would be the best possible opportunity for a meeting.
He has also repeated that the relationship between Taiwan and China, according to the Constitution, is not “state-to-state,” only to tell Taiwanese that Taiwan is a sovereign and independent country.
The president loves to admonish people for judging him by single incidents, yet when they look at his long-term performance, they are likely to discover the president has two faces.
The fact is that Ma has always tried to serve his cross-strait agenda and boost his personal reputation at the expense of Taiwan’s global standing.
That will be his legacy.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers