Is Denmark’s apparent change in its “one China” policy a warning to Taiwan about what might come in the future? Denmark seems to move ahead alone, but if this policy is spreading to other EU member countries, it will make it even more difficult for Taiwanese to determine their own future. That the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) government considers Taiwan a part of China might even encourage this development.
Denmark appears to be on its way to change its “one China” policy in direction of considering Taiwan as a part of China.
This is not only questioning Denmark’s democratic values, but put it on the side of China in its territorial claims in Asia.
It appears that Denmark holds to the antiquated belief that dominating countries have the right to territories in their neighborhood without asking the local population, as Russia has done in Ukraine.
The apparent policy change is obvious from the Danish Foreign Ministry’s Web site, where Taiwan is listed as a part of China together with the Chinese flag and a map shows Taiwan as a part of China.
In a correspondence with the Danish Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the ministry does not acknowledge that this is an error, but refers to the general and ongoing evaluation of the content of the Web site.
The chairman of the Foreign Policy Committee of the Danish parliament is in line with the Danish foreign ministry.
In conclusion, an evaluation of the content of the Web site has approved that Taiwan is a part of China.
Moreover, since the ministry does not admit to any mistakes, Denmark’s “one China” policy has changed and it has broken with the policy of the vast majority of countries in the international community.
The vast majority of countries’ “one China” policy consider the People’s Republic of China as the sole government of China, but the same policy does not mention Taiwan.
Consequently, Taiwan is not considered as a part of China.
More than ever, it is clear that investments and trade with China has a higher value than democratic ideals. When it comes to Taiwan, its 23 million people are of minor importance, despite the fact that Taiwanese do not want to be part of China.
Today, the Sunflower movement and various demonstrations have shown that the so-called peaceful development between Taiwan and China over the past six years has met with great skepticism and clear demands for much greater transparency.
China’s aggressive behavior in the South and East China seas have made Asian countries concerned about its growing military and economic power.
Concerns raised by the US, Japan and Vietnam at the last meeting of Asia’s Security Forum are shared by other Asian countries.
Denmark is taking a European solo ride in changing its “one China” policy to support China’s claim to Taiwan.
Considering the most recent developments in Taiwan, and China’s behavior, it does not bode well for Denmark’s international reputation, but at least the two pandas that Denmark will receive from China over the coming year will feel right at home.
Michael Danielsen is chairman of Taiwan Corner.
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS