The cross-strait service trade agreement, which President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) has promoted so vigorously, has been widely questioned by the public and sparked the Sunflower movement.
Most criticism is on democratic issues, such as violations of procedural justice and public oversight. However, since the signing of the Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement between Taiwan and China in 2010, all cross-strait agreements have involved not only democratic issues, but also human rights.
The petition against the service trade agreement and the recent commodification of healthcare affects the public’s right to medical care.
Rights to health and an education are basic human rights and protecting them should be the government’s priority, after collecting taxes. They give everyone an equal foothold and let individuals flourish while also moving the goals of society toward fairness and wealth equality.
This is why the government should not commercialize healthcare and education and refrain from including them in the service trade agreement or the “free economic pilot zones.”
Perceptive people have commented that the inclusion of international healthcare services in the pilot zones may lead to the commodification of services and an outflow of key medical workers. Also, the Ministry of Education has proposed a draft for innovation in education, which includes setting up special universities and academies in the zones, but that plan has drawn protests from several educational groups opposed to the commodification of education.
The printing industry worries that opening up to China will affect freedom of speech. Also, the agreement opens the telecom sector, including information and communication infrastructure, which could compromise security, press freedom, freedom of expression on the Internet and national security.
Close attention must be paid to threats to other rights that might be hurt by Chinese capital, such as the right to work, survival — especially for the agricultural population and disadvantaged groups — equality and privacy as well as environmental rights.
Taiwan is a new democracy. The government must thoroughly review any agreements or treaties that it intends to sign with China, an authoritarian state that lacks all respect for human rights, so as not to damage the nation’s political system or the human rights of Taiwanese. If a cross-strait agreement merely benefits a few large corporations, such as the Hon Hai Group, whose chairman, Terry Gou (郭台銘), has said that “democracy fills no stomachs,” it violates principles of fairness and justice and further widens the wealth gap.
History reveals that as democracy takes root, it is necessary to push hard for human rights. For future cross-strait agreements, elected public representatives and civic groups should review content carefully, rejecting any agreement that violates democracy or human rights.
If the legislature cannot amend an agreement, it should demand the government not sign it.
Andrew Cheng is a researcher at Academia Sinica’s Institute of Biomedical Sciences.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations