Some time has passed since the Sunflower movement protests — which begun when a student-led group of protesters occupied the chamber of the Legislative Yuan on March 18 — have drawn to a close. Now that the excitement is over, it may be a bit easier for people to consider calmly the various aspects of the way protest movements have developed in this country.
Over the past few years, Taiwan has seen a never-ending series of protest movements, be they big or small in terms of participants. Protest has become a typical state of affairs in the nation and serves as an emotional outlet. Can a new force, or a new civic movement, come into being — one that transcends political parties and social classes and is pure, selfless, peaceful and rational? While many people would like to see that happen, it is by no means a certainty.
Economic wealth is becoming increasingly concentrated in the hands of a minority, while the country’s future is in the hands of a bunch of politicians whose salient characteristics are their shortsightedness and ideological bias.
Looking no further than the next election, they are only concerned with pleasing their core supporters.
Almost every clash between purportedly different political approaches is just another form of infighting between the pan-blues and pan-greens, or a bartering of interests between the two sides. Incapable of devoting themselves to basic constructive reform, politicians have let the nation slide into stagnation and even regression.
President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and his government might promise in all sincerity that they are striving for the prosperity of the nation, but their performance has earned them no plaudits. People are largely subject to psychological perceptions and infectious emotions. For most people, the central question is not whether a government’s reforms can make society fairer and more equal, but whether the fairness and equality that they seek can give the public a sense of belonging, cohesion and group consciousness.
Society is filled with distrust and people feel very insecure about what the future has in store for them. Most people are bogged down in “postmodern collective anxiety.” Many think that life is unfair and they feel uneasy, frustrated and disheartened. It is easy for them to find fault, but not to find a piece of driftwood that they can use to stay afloat.
When people take part in social movements that focus on freedom and resistance, it can give them a sense of liberation, like Prometheus unbound, and allows them to feel they are the masters of their own fates. For others, it is a matter of following the latest fashion — the herd mentality — in a search for social recognition and self-realization.
Protest is not purely a reaction against government policy. It gives people a new understanding of society, culture and history. Social movements are not merely fashions. They can shape the direction and environment of future political developments and spur them on, while inspiring political ideas, organizations and trends.
However, one thing that Taiwan may have in common with other new democracies is that its political movements tend to lack independence and are incapable of attracting a diversity of civic forces from across the spectrum of society. These factors prevent them from effectively monitoring possible abuses of power by the government and political parties or from compelling leaders to carry out needed reforms.
One reason for this is that the nation’s particular political environment makes it easy for people involved in social movements to wear the colors of the pan-blue or pan-green camps. Then, they tend to specialize in self-criticism and go quiet when confronted by the opposition. They fail to confront those in power in a consistent manner. This turns protests into a mere extension of political infighting, while social movements become factions of political parties.
The second reason is that some activists, while emphasizing a peaceful and rational approach, refuse to engage in open dialogue.
They only tolerate political and cultural discourse from within their own groups. This is a kind of ideological imperialism and many cannot understand why activists of this kind think that only the views they express and their own opinions can be right and everyone else must be wrong.
Over the past couple of decades, infighting between the pan-blue and pan-green camps has brought Taiwan to its knees, almost to the point of paralysis.
Most people are sick and tired of the fighting, but cannot get away from it. When society is so stricken by depression and anxiety, there is an urgent need for a genuinely popular force to appear in the limelight.
Sad to say, the notion of “the people” has been used and abused so much that it has lost its essential meaning. It has become an abstract concept that is open to manipulation in attempts to mold or please public opinion. Consequently, when it is used as a call to join a struggle, it can sound very dissonant.
Civic movements must strive to escape from the characteristics that stem from their past dependence on political parties and develop more sophisticated and comprehensive patterns of behavior.
At the same time, they must uphold the possibility of dialogue, as befits a democratic society. This openness would make the world more tolerant and diverse and make it possible for the centrist forces that exist among Taiwanese to converge and come to the fore.
Chiou Tian-juh is a professor of social psychology at Shih Hsin University.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US