Recent protests in Vietnam over China’s placement of an oil rig in the South China Sea have drawn a lot of attention in Taiwan, because some of the more violent protests damaged the properties of 224 Taiwanese companies and disrupted the operations of about 1,100.
Vietnamese authorities are worried the riots will deter Taiwanese investment, with Vietnamese Prime Minister Nguyen Tan Dung reportedly promising to take measures to compensate the affected businesses. Senior Vietnamese officials are to arrive in Taipei this week to discuss compensation issues and other trade matters.
Traditional manufacturing appears to be dying out in Taiwan. It began when many labor-intensive manufacturers began relocating abroad about three decades ago. Industries such as shoe-making, food processing, textile production and the furniture sector were once the pillars of the nation’s economy, but the focus of the government now is the information and communication technology sector — at least that is how people see it.
Amid speculation that Vietnam-based Taiwanese companies may choose to relocate to China or invest at home because of safety concerns, the government has begun a campaign to urge them to return home, with the Ministry of Economic Affairs planning an investment summit Friday to explain the investment environment and incentive packages offered.
As challenges to business are now rising in China, including surges in labor and land prices, higher environmental standards as well as increases in social security and pension-related spending, overseas Taiwanese firms are certainly looking for alternatives. Of course, it is also possible that years of stagnant growth in wages might make the nation attractive to Taiwanese manufacturers.
Even though increasing domestic employment would help enhance wages and boost private spending, if the government must extend more investment incentives to overseas Taiwanese firms, an important question to be asked is: Why did these firms not move back home en masse, as expected, after the government first addressed the issue in 2012?
That is when the government announced plans to lure Taiwanese businesses home, with a goal of attracting NT$100 billion (US$3.32 billion) in each of the following two years and creating 82,000 jobs. Yet government statistics show that as of the first quarter of this year, while overseas Taiwanese pledged to invest NT$198.2 billion over the past two years, to date just 30,000 jobs have been created.
One has to wonder why the number of jobs is less than expected and question if the government has resolved problems facing investors, such as the shortage of skilled labor, land acquisition and securing loans.
Moreover, the prospect of overseas Taiwanese businesses returning home has also raised concerns about the nation’s technical and vocational education. The reality is that our recent graduates do not meet the manufacturing industry’s needs nowadays.
As the US and other developed countries pursue “re-industrialization” and the comparative advantage of investing in China and Southeast Asian economies gradually diminishes, Taiwan must re-establish the domestic manufacturing sector’s competitiveness by positioning it at the top of the global value chain. High-end and high-value-added manufacturing implies the need to adopt more automation, promote environmental sustainability and upgrade technology and research and development capabilities.
Instead of welcoming returning Taiwanese businesses with open arms, the nation needs to focus on creating a government that has consistent policies and more efficient civil servants, as well as a society that has large pools of entry-level workers and experienced employees.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US