Power grids need to be provided with electricity that is flexible and can be quickly allocated. However, renewable energy sources, such as wind power and photovoltaic power, are dependent on climatic conditions and cannot be automatically allocated. As a result, countries in which renewable energy sources account for a greater proportion of the supply often rely on transnational grids to exchange electricity with neighboring countries as demand dictates.
They also often have to maintain a greater number of power plants to ensure a stable supply of electricity, which is why renewable energy sources cannot greatly reduce the number of traditional power stations. This is why renewable energy sources still cannot replace traditional power stations.
Taiwan is a small and densely populated nation. Onshore wind farms are almost saturated, so even if the public was encouraged to invest in power generation to earn money to help stop complaints about wind farms, there is a limit to how much further onshore wind farms can be developed.
Furthermore, photovoltaic power is expensive and, if excessively developed, could cause rapid electricity price increases.
Many people who claim that Germany’s electricity prices have not increased by much mostly ignore the tax issue. Considering only the price of electricity, from 1998 to last year Germany’s electricity prices for household consumers only increased by 11.7 percent. However, when taxes such as surcharges on renewable energy are factored in, the figure is 68.5 percent.
One of the prices that Germany has had to pay for its transformation in energy sources has been a rapid increase in taxes to help support the development of renewable energy sources. For example, surcharges on power from renewable sources went from 0.0008 euros to 0.00528 euros, and Germany’s electricity prices today are more than double those in the US.
Germany has started amending its Renewable Energy Law, and it has greatly lowered its development goals for renewable energy to slow down the problem of massive electricity price hikes. At present, Taiwan’s onshore wind farms are becoming saturated and if too much is invested in other renewable energy sources with a higher possibility for growth too early, it will result in large increases in electricity prices.
Although Germany is a net power exporter, it must still rely on imported power to ensure the stability of its power supply. Germany uses transnational power grids. As a producer of excess electricity, Germany can export power to neighboring countries and when renewable energy reserves are low due to climatic factors, it can purchase power.
Therefore, transnational power grids are one of the major conditions that allow Germany to spend a lot of effort on developing renewable energy sources.
In addition, part of the reason Germany can be a net power exporter is the uncontrollable nature of balancing renewable energy sources. For example, when energy supply exceeds demand — when there is a lot of sunlight and sufficient wind — it must export this surplus power to neighboring countries by selling it cheaply or even paying to export it to maintain the stability of its own domestic power networks. On the other hand, at night or when there is a lack of sufficient wind, Germany must purchase power from its neighbors at elevated prices.
This means that when other countries are in need of electricity, prices naturally go up. Therefore, being a net energy exporter does not necessarily mean that a country has a net surplus of electricity.
After Germany got rid of some its nuclear power stations in 2011, the amount of power generated from renewable energy sources increased, but an extra 21.9 billion watts of electricity were produced by coal-fired power plants, an increase of approximately 8.6 percent that caused an increase in carbon dioxide emissions.
It is worth noting that although Germany’s goal is to be nuclear-free by 2022, 17 to 19 percent of its power supply comes from nuclear power stations.
Taiwan should develop renewable energy sources, despite the lack of stability, low efficiency and high prices that are restrictions that need to be overcome. As a result, the nation needs to simultaneously develop other energy sources to use in conjunction with renewable energy ones.
More than 98 percent of Taiwan’s energy is imported and it does not have any neighbors with which it can share power grids. Blindly relying on renewable energy sources alone poses a very high risk that it will threaten the stability of the nation’s electricity supply.
Chen Shao-wen is an assistant professor in the Department of Engineering and System Science at National Tsing Hua University.
Translated by Drew Cameron
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US