Taiwanese businesspeople have been investing in Vietnam for more than 20 years. These investments total US$28 billion and their performance has been highly praised by the Vietnamese government. Whether in terms of business, social relations or intermarriage, the two countries maintain a close relationship. It was quite unexpected that these friendly relations would be weak enough to suddenly break under the weight of the Vietnamese people’s anti-Chinese protests.
Since Vietnam has a long history of anti-Chinese sentiment, the protests have not come as a surprise. During a visit to the Vietnam Museum of National History in Hanoi many years ago, I saw two large white stone carvings in the museum with the text “The sisters Trung Trac and Trung Nhi, two national heroes of resistance against China.” These two sisters were two heroes killed during resistance against Chinese aggression during the Eastern Han period.
The best known anti-Chinese activity in recent history was when North Vietnam turned on China after defeating the South in April 1975, despite the longstanding massive economic and military assistance China had given to the north in its war against the US. They expelled all Chinese within their borders and purged domestic pro-Chinese factions. This was the cause of China’s punitive war against Vietnam in 1979.
In 1975, Vietnam adopted an anti-Chinese policy in Vietnam, forcing people of Chinese ethnicity to obtain Vietnamese citizenship, banning Chinese-language schools and newspapers and Chinese organizations, forcing Chinese people to take Vietnamese names, confiscating Chinese-owned companies and placing restrictions on the positions that people of Chinese ethnicity could hold in the ruling party, the government and the military.
These measures were in place until 1986, when a new policy was adopted and the restrictions on business involvement for ethnic Chinese were gradually relaxed. Because the economic activity of ethnic Chinese had been suppressed for so long, the Vietnamese economy was on the brink of collapse, which led to a change in policy that allowed the participation of ethnic Chinese.
At the same time, Taiwanese businesspeople were invited to help revive the economy. This demonstrates that Vietnam has used Taiwanese businesspeople for economic and political reasons.
Despite all this, Vietnamese still harbor distrust of ethnic Chinese. The recent anti-Chinese protests set off by Chinese oil exploration near the Paracel Islands (Xisha Islands, 西沙群島) in the South China Sea easily stirred up anti-Chinese nationalist sentiment, which only goes to show that the Vietnamese do not approve of and are not grateful for, the investments of Taiwanese businesspeople in Vietnam which has assisted Vietnam’s growth.
Vietnamese should be able to recognize the Taiwanese businesspeople that have invested in their areas. In southern Vietnam, it is unlikely that people don’t know where the managers of Taiwanese business are from, because the numbers of Chinese businesspeople that have invested there are very small. In the South, any factory with visible Chinese characters was destroyed which implies direct targeting.
Why didn’t Vietnamese military and police maintain law and order around Taiwanese factories during the protests? One of the reasons for this is likely to be tacit governmental approval of the protests.
During the nationwide anti-Chinese protests in Indonesia toward the end of the Suharto era in 1998, when factories owned by ethnic Chinese were destroyed, police and military that were present at the protests did nothing to stop them.
There were rumors that the military tacitly approved of the protests, but despite that, many Taiwanese businesspeople requested the protection of the military and police, and managed to evade the riots. However, during the protests in Vietnam the police and military did not maintain order.
Vietnam is a communist country, and it is only because of its ability to maintain law and order that foreign businesspeople choose to invest in the country. It was quite unexpected, and regrettable, that the Vietnamese government did nothing, and it should therefore take some of the blame for the protests.
To protect businesspeople, Taiwan and Vietnam signed an agreement to promote and protect investment in 1993. Article 5 of this agreement states that any restoration, reparations, compensation or other settlement awarded by either party of the agreement to the other as a result of losses to approved investments caused by war, armed conflict, national emergencies, riots, rebellion or unrest, shall not be less than the what the awarding party would award a third party investor in the same situation.
The government should demand compensation from Vietnam based on this rule. The relevant authorities should set up a task force and invite international arbitration or respected individuals to act as consultants in order to submit a demand for compensation.
Taiwan’s is currently experiencing an economic downturn and the question of how to increase domestic investment and improve the job situation has become the government’s main focus.
The government should therefore use this situation as an opportunity to convince businesspeople whose Vietnamese investments have been jeopardized due to the protests to bring their investments to Taiwan, and the competent authorities should give careful consideration to providing awards and guidance to anyone who chooses to do so.
Chen Hurng Yu is a professor in the Graduate Institute of Asian Studies at Tamkang University.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US