On Sunday last week — Mothers’ Day, one mother started an indefinite hunger strike in front of the Ministry of Defense. She is Yu Jui-ming (尤瑞敏), whose son, air force staff sergeant Tsai Hsueh-liang (蔡學良), died during target practice on a shooting range on May 9, 2008.
Following Tsai’s death, military authorities quickly concluded that he had committed suicide, but there are many suspicious aspects to the case that have prevented Yu from accepting the official story. Over the years, she has done the rounds of government departments, asking for a live-round ballistics test and an incident reconstruction to be carried out.
A death during shooting practice could be suicide, homicide, or an accident. From the military’s point of view, suicide is the best of these options, and the least troublesome. The other options, apart from suicide, would both require the military authorities to look into where they went wrong and seek to apportion blame.
If Tsai did kill himself, why choose to do it during one of his company’s firearms training sessions, when everyone could see him? What did he do and say before killing himself? Did he want to make a statement with his death, or was it a protest against abuse within the military? These are all matters that should be investigated and clarified — all the more so if it was homicide or an accident.
A crime scene reconstruction might provide answers to these questions. Incident reconstruction is a well-developed method of investigation that is often employed in Taiwan. The most well-known case in Taiwan was when a court invited US forensic scientist Henry Lee (李昌鈺) to conduct a crime scene reconstruction, from which he concluded that the 1991 murder of a couple in Sijhih (汐止) in what was then-Taipei County, for which one person was executed and three others condemned to death, could have been committed by one person acting alone, thus establishing the innocence of the three men on death row.
Only six years have passed since Tsai’s death. The list of names of officers and men who served in his company is still available, so it would not be hard to locate all the people who were present on the day of his death.
The shooting range is reportedly still in its original condition. Photographs and video footage taken from the original on-site investigation, in combination with the autopsy report, would be of some help in reconstructing the scene of the incident. If experienced and trusted investigation experts were invited to handle the case, they should be able to get close to the truth and provide answers to the doubts plaguing Yu.
Yu is very keen for an incident reconstruction to be held, but according to existing laws the results of such a reconstruction would not be acceptable as evidence unless ordered by court judges. Despite all Yu’s efforts over the years, she has not found any department that is both authorized and willing to carry out a reconstruction.
Last year, the case of Hung Chung-chiu (洪仲丘), who died because of alleged abuse just before completing his mandatory military service, brought 250,000 white-shirted protesters out onto Ketagalan Boulevard in front of the Presidential Office Building.
Premier Jiang Yi-huah (江宜樺) responded to public indignation by announcing the establishment of the Military Injustice Petitions Committee to handle and reopen if necessary investigations into cases of suspicious death in the military. This gave Yu hope that the committee, formed under the authority of the Cabinet and with abundant resources at its disposal, would carry out a substantial investigation into her son’s death.
However, the committee has so far done nothing about it, and its convener Luo Ying-shay (羅瑩雪) has since been promoted to minister of justice. It is this irresponsible and insincere attitude that has forced Yu to resort to a hunger strike in protest.
A dead person’s relatives have the right to formally request an investigation into the cause of death, so Yu is merely asking for her due rights as a mother. The public’s distrust in the government is a result of the government’s reaction.
Jiang should not delay in responding to Yu’s request. He can win back the public’s trust by doing something about it. If he does nothing, the situation will continue to deteriorate, and that would be a very ill-advised course to follow.
Hsiao I-min is executive secretary of the Judicial Reform Foundation.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers