The skyscraper index
What do you think? Will China ever complete the Shanghai tower? The rarely discussed “skyscraper index” is highly correlative with a nation’s hubris and failed monetary policy.
Although the cyclic nature of construction is described as “whimsical,” Wikipedia says: “Business cycles and skyscraper construction correlate in such a way that investment in skyscrapers peaks when cyclical growth is exhausted and the economy is ready for recession.”
Look back to the then-tallest Singer Building following the panic crash of 1907. Later, the Empire State Building and others should have been red flags that these new super-tall buildings were part of an overheating economy.
The market crash of 1929 followed soon thereafter.
From the Sears Tower in 1997 to the Petronas Towers in Malaysia during the middle of the Asian financial crisis, the world’s tallest buildings do not exactly have a sterling reputation.
Even the current-tallest Burj Dubai is facing criticism for being wasteful and extravagant.
Property markets around the world are collapsing. It is a minefield for investors.
Sadly, at the same time there are many homeless, displaced people and refugees with nowhere to call home on this Earth, whether they are on the border with Lebanon, Christmas Island, or trafficked refugees dying on boats in perilous waters.
These are the downsides of bank financing and unsound money. Hubris will be the demise of mankind.
That said, what does the skyscraper index say about our iconic Taipei 101? Has Taiwan dodged a bullet? So far, yes.
However, property values in Taiwan are over-valued by at least 65 percent and the biggest problem is most of the new apartments are palaces for the super-rich. Investors should sell at this current peak in property prices.
Young workers are advised to rent the cheapest place they can while saving and wait for the inevitable price correction. Gold is the recommended savings vehicle of choice, especially because it is still on sale thanks to price manipulation.
If you experienced vertigo watching the “Shanghai Tower Climb” on YouTube, you will understand my dread that the inevitable disaster-in-waiting that mankind has built over our finite planet is more precarious than ever.
China’s economy is just as fragile. Look at the preposterous corporate debt-to-GDP ratio, which is much higher than Taiwan’s, which is also a shocking figure.
Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe’s policies are financially insane from any balance-sheet viewpoint.
The US is devolving into terminal decline, and the rest of the planet is so ridden with gangsters, crime, nepotism, corruption, outright sectarian warfare and environmental pollution that it’s hard to see a light at the end of the tunnel.
What makes me sad is that all of Taiwan’s political parties seem to be willfully ignoring the macro factors amid partisan squabbling over minutiae. What gives me hope is that I live in Taiwan amid the energetic students here.
Any worst-case scenario means that Taiwan needs to produce its own food and energy in preparation for crisis, including typhoons, earthquakes and other unavoidable disasters.
The dominoes are lined up on a house of cards that is balancing on the backs of a circle of black swans. Invest wisely out there.
Torch Pratt
Yonghe, New Taipei City
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US