At first glance the sprawling campus amid glorious countryside looks an unlikely base from which to wage war against Italy’s most feared crime organization, the ’Ndrangheta.
And yet the laboratories of Campden BRI, once part of the University of Bristol and now a major research hub, are, in their own quiet way, playing a vital role in tackling organized crime.
The laboratories are not conducting forensic tests on specks of blood or splinters of bone. Rather, they have been contracted by the British government’s Rural Payments Agency to carry out chemical tests to establish the purity of olive oil which, since March, has been subject to new EU regulations designed to ensure that consumers get what they believe they are paying for.
Illustration: Mountain People
This is bad news for the ’Ndrangheta and other organized criminal gangs, which for decades have been assiduously passing off inferior olive oil and oil from other vegetable sources as the premium extra virgin variety.
According to the European parliament’s food safety committee, olive oil is the product most at risk of food fraud, and the rewards for its adulteration are substantial.
Cheap pomace olive oil — extracted from olive residue using chemicals — sells for £0.32 (US$0.54) per 100ml, compared with £1.50 for extra virgin.
“Olive oil is a valuable commodity, and fraud is on the increase,” said Julian South, head of chemistry and biochemistry at Campden BRI.
“Food authenticity continues to be a high-profile issue, and the testing of olive oils is taking place in all European Union member states,” South said.
Jenny Morris, principal policy officer at the Chartered Institute for Environmental Health, acknowledged that olive oil was ripe for fraud.
“A lot of people buy virgin olive oil,” she said. “They like the fact that it is high quality and they are prepared to pay a premium. If you are a criminal and you get hold of some oil, not necessarily olive oil, you can color it green with a bit of chlorophyll and make a lot of money out of it. Because of its distribution, it is sometimes hard to track.”
However, many other products are almost as vulnerable to criminal adulteration as olive oil.
Other popular and lucrative frauds include diluting honey with cheap sugar syrup, passing off methanol as vodka, mixing inferior rice with premium basmati and switching cheap fish such as catfish with expensive alternatives like haddock.
It certainly beats mixing cocaine with bulking agents like talcum powder — an activity that is far riskier than corrupting the food chain, according to experts.
“At the moment the risks for criminals operating in this field are low because they are not routinely coming up against trained and organized professional investigators,” Gary Copson, a former London Metropolitan police detective and adviser to the government’s Elliot review into food chain integrity, told a parliamentary committee earlier this year.
“While there is excellent work being done by trading standards, it is generally focused at a lower level. They don’t have the capacity to work at the higher level that we have seen and suspect is in the background,” Copson said, according to Environmental Health News.
The Elliot review, due to report by early June, is to help to highlight the extent to which organized crime has penetrated food distribution networks.
This became apparent during the European horsemeat scandal last year and was confirmed in February following the launch of Operation Opson III, an Interpol campaign that seized more than 1,200 tonnes of fake or substandard food and nearly 430,000 liters of counterfeit drinks.
Almost 100 people were arrested or detained in 33 countries, while officers impounded more than 131,000 liters of oil and vinegar, 80,000 biscuits and chocolate bars, 20 tonnes of spices and condiments, 186 tonnes of cereals, 45 tonnes of dairy products and 42 liters of honey.
The largest amounts of foodstuffs seized were in the fish or seafood category — including 484 tonnes of yellowfin tuna.
Some of the frauds uncovered in the operation came straight from the pages of bad novels. Investigators discovered an organized crime network in Italy behind the manufacture and distribution of fake champagne.
Materials to prepare 60,000 bottles, including fake labels, were seized following raids on two sites, with three people arrested and 24 others reported to authorities.
In Bangkok, the Royal Thai police raided a warehouse and recovered more than 270 bottles of fake whisky, as well as forged stickers, labels and packaging.
Officials in the Philippines seized nearly 150,000 fake stock cubes, while French police identified and shut down an illegal abattoir on the outskirts of Paris.
In Spain, 24 people were detained for illegal work and immigration offenses after investigators recovered 4.5 tonnes of snails that had been taken from woods and fields.
In the UK, police seized 17,156 liters of counterfeit vodka, with an estimated street value of £1 million, worth about £270,000 to the UK exchequer in duty and sales tax.
Michael Ellis, head of Interpol’s trafficking in illicit goods and counterfeiting unit, said at the time that the operation would have opened many people’s eyes to the threats posed by organized criminal networks.
“Most people would be surprised at the everyday foods and drink which are being counterfeited, and the volume of seizures shows that this is a serious global problem,” he said.
However, counterfeiting is only one weapon in the criminal gangs’ armory.
In Mexico, a drug cartel known as the Knights Templar has been taking over lime farms in an area called the Tierra Caliente.
The cartel now controls a large proportion of the limes exported to the US, with the result that prices have tripled. The same group is also seeking to control the avocado trade.
In some cases, the role of criminal networks in the food chain has proved fatal. More than 40 people were killed by methanol-contaminated vodka and rum in the Czech Republic in 2012. At least one person has died in the UK.
UK trading standards departments have warned that there has been a fivefold increase in seizures of counterfeit alcohol since 2009. Fakes have been found to contain a range of dangerous contaminants, including isopropanol, methanol and chloroform.
The use of the industrial chemical melamine to increase protein in baby milk powder in China in 2008 also resulted in deaths, but also, according to experts, proved that criminal gangs were becoming more sophisticated in their use of technology to carry out fraud.
“The most surprising aspect is the ingenuity,” said Stuart Shotton, consultancy services director at Foodchain Europe, which advises the industry on food security.
“You’ve got some very clever people — food technologists; people who are experienced in the industry — who are making decisions and changes on a scientific basis to figure out what they can do to a product to increase its commercial viability,” Shotton said.
Shotton said criminal gangs would move into food fraud if they were attracted by one of two factors.
“Either a product is high value but low volume and you want to replace certain elements to make more of a profit, or it is low price [but] high volume, where economies of scale dictate that if you can shave a penny off a product and you are selling a million products, you’ve made a substantial amount of money,” he said.
He called on the food industry to learn from other industries, such as fashion brands, if it was going to secure itself successfully against criminal activity.
“We don’t have holograms or watermarks — maybe that is the route we need to start going down,” Shotton said.
However, the full extent to which fraud in the food industry is down to criminal networks is unclear as there is currently a lack of data.
Some of the fraud is clearly perpetrated by small-time players rather than organized crime. For example, a London-based importer was recently fined £17,000 after passing off syrup as honey. However, even the actions of some small-scale fraudsters can have large-scale repercussions.
“Look at [the red dye] Sudan 1,” Morris said. “It was down to enterprising small-scale producers of chilli in Italy realizing that if their powder looked redder, they’d get more money for it. So how did they make it redder? They put industrial floor dye into it.”
The UK Food Standards Agency acknowledges that reports of known or suspected food fraud have steadily risen year after year since the inception of its food fraud database in 2007. Back then just 49 reports were submitted. Last year the number had increased to 1,538.
A spokesman said that the most common concern — involving 16 percent of all reports submitted last year — was to do with the sale of “unfit food.”
Counterfeit alcohol, mostly vodka and wine, was the second-largest issue, representing about 14 percent of the reports created.
However, the nature of the food industry means frauds can change very quickly.
For clues as to which food groups criminal gangs are considering ripe for future fraud, it may be helpful to look to the US, where something called the Pharmacopeial Convention’s food fraud database tracks media reports of food fraud.
Products currently subject to serious fraud include turmeric and chili powder, cooking oil, shrimp, lemon juice and maple syrup.
According to foodqualitynews.com, not one of these was in the top 25 list of food frauds between 1980 and 2010.
The Elliot review is expected to recommend that the food industry must “think like a criminal” if it is to thwart criminal activity. This is something other countries have been doing for years.
“Look at the Italians,” Morris said. “They deal with a lot of food crime involving premium products like buffalo mozzarella or olive oil. They ask themselves, ‘Where is the biggest opportunity to make money? Let’s focus there.’ The only way you are going to head off the crooks is to have an idea of where they are going to strike and target your surveillance resource there.”
Hilary Ross, a lawyer with the firm DWF who has 22 years’ experience of food fraud and was a contributor to the Elliot review, agreed there was a need for fresh thinking.
“In the last five years we’ve seen an increase in food prices, economic instability, shortages due to climatic changes. When that happens foods prices tend to change and then there is a greater likelihood of fraud,” she said.
The secret was to examine global events that criminals would seek to exploit, Ross said.
“We need intelligence-gathering and horizon-scanning, not just by individuals, but by European and international bodies, so that, for example, we can identify if there is going to be a crop shortage. That’s where criminality breeds,” she said.
However, Morris conceded that keeping the criminal networks in check was nearly impossible.
“The reality is you will never stop them entirely,” she said. “You just have to look at the biggest opportunities and then try to stop them.”
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers