We first met you when you came to the Netherlands in 1988. It was only a couple of years after you had been released from prison. You had gone through indescribable pain and anguish after the loss of your mother and twin daughters, Ting-chun (亭均) and Liang-chun (亮均) on Feb. 28, 1980.
Thirty-four years later it is still unimaginable that a cruel and repressive Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) regime could allow that to happen, and still get away with it, even to this day.
However, your visit in 1988 expressed hope: You smiled and we enjoyed visiting various places in the Netherlands and Belgium. We looked at the future with optimism. Martial law had been lifted in 1987, and the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) had been established the year before. You would soon go back to Taiwan, later become the chairman of the DPP and lead it to victory in the election of 2000.
In the many years since then you showed your determination to do what is right for Taiwan and you have always been a man of principle. We greatly admire you for what you have done for Taiwan. It means a great deal to know that there are people with ideas and ideals for which they stand.
In the present debate about the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant we fully agree with you that it is time for the government and the people of Taiwan to say “no” to the construction and operation of a nuclear power plant so close to a major metropolitan area. To make this happen in a democratic fashion it is essential that the referendum law is changed and the 50 percent “birdcage” clause be dropped.
Your fast has galvanized tens of thousands of people into action and there is now an incredible amount of momentum in the campaign for closure of the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant and establishing a nuclear-free Taiwan. Through your actions, the majority of the public now see clearly that it is high time for Taiwan to change course and shift to alternative energy sources, as well as work on energy conservation.
What we really want to say is that you have achieved your objectives and that we don’t want to lose you. You have given us inspiration and hope and Taiwanese need you by their side in further battles for Taiwan and its future as a free and democratic nation. As your daughter Judy wrote so movingly in her letter on Easter Sunday 2014: “Please keep on striving for your cause and stay in our lives.”
All the efforts by you and many other courageous people in Taiwan, young and old, are now turning into a stream, and the stream is turning into a tide of freedom and democracy that can never be turned back.
Gerrit and Mei-chin van der Wees are editors of Taiwan Communique, a publication based in Washington.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US