Last week, China Development Financial Holding Corp and Cosmos Bank received approval at their shareholder meetings for their planned merger, paving the way for the first commercial bank merger in this nation in the past six years.
The deal is likely to be completed by the end of July, if the Financial Supervisory Commission gives the go-ahead.
There are 37 domestic banks, down from 53 in 2000. The number has remained steady since then, although the banking system is still fraught with the problems of fragmentation and interest margin compression as a result of over-concentration.
It has been difficult to push financial consolidation in the banking sector since 2006, following the controversy related to the then-Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) government’s “second phase of financial reforms.” The scheme, designed to streamline the domestic banking system and boost local banks’ competitiveness, was halted in 2006 amid concerns that it might only benefit a few rich families and large conglomerates.
Earlier this year, the government started drumming up support for bank mergers, especially the integration of government-run or state-controlled institutions, in a bid to help domestic banks become bigger and stronger thus regionally competitive.
Last month, the Ministry of Finance said it would complete its evaluation of proposed mergers and acquisitions among state banks in two to four months, hoping the first deal will emerge this year.
Based on government data, the ministry has a majority control in the Bank of Taiwan, Land Bank of Taiwan, Taiwan Cooperative Bank, Export-Import Bank of the ROC, Hua Nan Commercial Bank, First Commercial Bank, Mega International Commercial Bank and the Taiwan Business Bank. Their combined assets of NT$17.13 trillion (US$569 billion) account for 47.2 percent of the total assets in the nation’s banking system, and the ratio rises to 51.7 percent after including the assets of the Chang Hwa Commercial Bank, which is 20 percent owned by the ministry.
Advocates of new mergers believe better synergies emerge when those with higher market shares take over those with less. Economists say the banking sector also needs to go global to become more competitive, instead of focusing on the domestic market.
The problem is that the government’s efforts to reduce its stakes in state banks or orchestrate bank mergers have been met with political and social opposition — especially increased hostility from bank employees and labor unions. As such, unwarranted competition will persist in the domestic banking sector until more constructive deals occur.
Thus far, the government has said that its policy for the financial sector this year is to expand the scale of domestic banks and enable them to compete in the regional market within three years. However, rather than just pushing for mergers, a fully transparent process when implementing this scheme is needed, not a secretive plan that leaves employees feeling they are being manipulated into joining the government’s plans.
Any meaningful merger that intends to raise efficiency must involve well-planned corporate restructuring and reform of bank governance. The restructuring plans must allow for a separation of ownership and management functions, enabling specialized managers to oversee daily business and develop new products based on their ability, while remaining free of pressure from the government and undue intimidation.
In addition, the government must stop political patronage and cronyism and allow professional management to prevail in banking. It also needs to develop a corporate governance culture among all state-run banks to promote accountability and transparency in corporate dealings, as well as review the banks’ overall wage structure to help boost recruitment and retain staff.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past