The Sunflower movement, and the occupation of the legislature, has been going on now for almost three weeks. The students and the government are locked in a game of chicken, with all the makings of a crash from which no one will remain unscathed.
On Sunday, Legislative Speaker Wang Jin-pyng (王金平) entered the fray and the Legislative Yuan to talk to the students, offering them a way out at the 11th hour. In response to their demand that a new law governing legislative oversight of cross-strait agreements first be put in place and then the service trade agreement reviewed, Wang assured them he would not continue cross-party talks on the agreement until legislative oversight regulations had been finalized.
That Wang, as legislative speaker, has — in this moment of national crisis and at a time when the government is prevaricating woefully — returned to the Legislative Yuan and played such a decisive role is worthy of his position and has won the approval of the nation, whatever the students or the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) may think of his actions.
For too long now the legislature, under the iron grip of the KMT, with its large majority, has been unable to operate as it should, as an autonomous national congress. Wang has chosen to disregard President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and the KMT’s plan of proceeding with the oversight legislation and the review in parallel, deciding instead to respond to the students’ demands independently, with the authority which is vested in him by his official position.
The KMT wasn’t best pleased.
Wang’s situation is complicated. The courts have recently frustrated his own party’s attempts to have him stripped of his KMT membership. He is both affiliated with the KMT and unaffiliated. Neither the party whip nor the looming legislative elections hold any fear for him, which cannot be said for the KMT legislators that accompanied him to meet the students.
As soon as the subsequent press conference was over, their thoughts turned to the crack of the party whip and they scrambled to distance themselves from Wang. However big names in the party like Taipei Mayor Hau Lung-bin (郝龍斌), New Taipei City Mayor Eric Chu (朱立倫) and Greater Taichung Mayor Jason Hu (胡志強) all came out in support of Wang, which represents yet another major challenge to Ma’s leadership.
Ma is under considerable pressure because of his inability to either placate or engage with the students and he cannot send in the police to expel the protesters. He has been relying on the methods of the National Security Council Secretary-General King Pu-tsung (金溥聰), who is employing propaganda and scare-mongering in an attempt to whittle away the students’ strength and resolve. Neither Ma nor King had counted on Wang’s move, which has scuppered these tactics and disconcertingly thrust Ma from center stage.
Those sympathetic to the students’ cause, in academia, the media or politicians of all affiliations, are now calling on the protesters to withdraw in response to the olive branch Wang has extended. Their demands for legislation first, then review, have been met for the most part. They would be withdrawing in glory. Constitutional government cannot be won overnight, but the student movement has highlighted the flaws in the system and the seeds for constitutional reform have been sown. All that remains is to wait for them to sprout.
Not all of the demands have been met, but the students must learn to compromise. Their David, pitted against the state’s Goliath, has achieved a startling victory. If they stay on in the hope of total victory, their generals will tire, their troops will falter and they might face the ignominious ending of being forcibly expelled.
They have achieved their aims. They should leave, and allow the legislators do what they are paid to do. Now is the time to return to school and from there press legislators to make good on their promises of setting up legislative oversight for cross-strait agreements. This would be the perfect conclusion to the Sunflower movement.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers