Turkish Nobel laureate Orhan Pamuk has described the situation in his country as “going from bad to worse and even towards terrible” following the government’s attempts to block access to Twitter, as a phalanx of writers from Zadie Smith to Gunter Grass line up to state their “grave concern” about “the freedom of words” in Turkey today.
The authors, who also include Salman Rushdie, Margaret Atwood, Karl Ove Knausgaard and fellow Nobel laureate of Grass and Pamuk — Elfriede Jelinek, have added their names to a joint letter from PEN International and English PEN.
PEN is a worldwide association of writers. It called the ban on Twitter announced two weeks ago “an unacceptable violation of the right to freedom of speech.”
The Turkish government restricted access to the micro-blogging Web site, and Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan indicated the ban could be extended, saying he would not “leave this nation at the mercy of YouTube and Facebook,” and pledging to “take the necessary steps in the strongest way.”
On Thursday, he appeared to follow up that threat as Turkish media reported that the country’s telecommunications authority had blocked YouTube as a “precautionary administrative measure.”
The latest curbs came hours after an audio recording of a high-level security meeting was leaked on the video-sharing Web site. Turkey previously banned YouTube in 2007, but lifted the ban three years later.
According to PEN, the Twitter ban remains in place despite an administrative court order on Wednesday ordering its suspension pending a court judgement.
Pamuk, who won the Nobel prize for literature in 2006, not long after Turkish state prosecutors had charged him with “insulting Turkishness” for remarks he made to an interviewer, told the Guardian “there were times in Turkey when free speech was equally bad ... as in 2008 when YouTube was closed, but at that time we were at least hopeful about the future. Not now. The situation here is going from bad to worse, and even towards terrible.”
Pamuk’s translator, Maureen Freely, the new president of English PEN, added: “The real worry, I think, is that Erdogan now seems to have the power to do whatever he wishes, whenever he wishes. And that is why we’re so concerned about what he’ll do next, to silence dissenters and crush opposition wherever he sees it.”
The signatories to the letter point to the fact Turkey ranks 154th among 180 countries on the World Press Freedom Index, saying that even today, “translators, editors, publishers, poets and writers face criminal proceedings and even imprisonment for legitimate expression under a variety of legislative fetters.”
PEN particularly highlighted the case of Muharrem Erbey, a human rights lawyer and writer who was arrested in 2009, and who is in prison awaiting trial. PEN believes the charges against the author are politically motivated, and that Erbey is being held because of his alleged affiliation with Kurdish political parties.
In their letter, the writers — from Turkey and around the world — are asking Turkey’s leaders “not to retreat from democracy and its keystone, freedom of speech; but rather to recognize their obligations under international treaties and to lift the block on Twitter.”
“We urge them to remember that this beautiful country will be stronger and happier when, and if, it appreciates pluralism, diversity and the freedom of words,” they write. “We welcome the administrative court in Ankara’s decision to suspend the [Twitter] ban ahead of a full judgment and urge the telecommunications authority to restore access to Twitter immediately.”
Author Elif Shafak, also tried for “insulting Turkishness” following the publication of her novel The Bastard of Istanbul, is one of the authors to sign the letter.
“Turkey’s rulers need to understand democracy is not solely about getting a majority of votes in the ballot box,” said Shafak, whose trial went on for a year before charges were dropped. “Far beyond that, democracy is a culture of inclusiveness, openness, human rights and freedom of speech, for each and every one, regardless of whichever party they voted for. It is the realization of the very core of democracy that has been sorely lacking in Turkey today.”
The letter comes in the wake of a new report from PEN International and English PEN on the Gezi Park protests last year, and their impact on freedom of expression.
“The excessive use of police force, as well as widespread media censorship and reprisals against journalists and users of social media, starkly illustrated the shortcomings of Turkish democracy in its lack of pluralism and disregard for fundamental rights and freedoms,” the report says.
It lists the “human rights violations” that took place during the protests and calls on the Turkish government to, among other things, ensure freedom of expression is respected and peaceful protestors are not detained.
PEN International and English PEN also wants the right to peaceful assembly included in Turkey’s proposed new constitution.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US