A lot of things can be done in 30 seconds. For example, brushing your teeth, placing an order for sun cakes or racing to a ticket counter before it closes.
However, until Monday last week, you would not imagine that list would include clearing the legislative review of a trade pact that matters to the livelihoods of hundreds of thousands of Taiwanese.
Yet, absurdly, that is exactly what happened on Monday last week, when Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Chang Ching-chung (張慶忠), with co-conveners of the legislature’s Internal Administration Committee, slated a mere 30 seconds to inspect the controversial cross-strait service trade pact as part of their effort to rush the accord through the committee review and move it to a floor session.
Chang’s move not only failed to honor the consensus to have the pact undergo an item-by-item review by the committee — a decision reached by all party caucuses in June last year — it also constituted a great blow against Taiwanese democracy and became a catalyst of the rage that drove student protesters to occupy the legislative chamber on Tuesday last week. The protesters are calling for Legislative Speaker Wang Jin-pyng (王金平) to nullify Chang’s decision and demanding that President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration withdraw the pact and institute a law governing supervision by the Legislative Yuan of all cross-strait agreements.
The stalemate between the student protesters and Ma still continues after more than a week. However, in one respect, the student movement has been successful: It has inspired public discourse and brought to national attention one core issue that until now has been much neglected — the need for an item-by-item review of the cross-strait service trade pact.
The controversial accord has been stalled in the legislature since it was signed in June last year after a process that was not made open to public scrutiny. If the students had not occupied the legislature in anger at Chang’s actions and the opaque handling of the agreement, the pact — given the KMT’s majority — may very well have been passed by the legislature, without any inspection of its contents.
If the pact is as good for the nation as the government claims, alleging it would bring more benefits than harm to local industries, an item-by-item committee review would provide a great opportunity for all to have a close look at its actual contents, delight in all the positives and therefore silence the naysayers. Moreover, given the KMT’s majority, it would have no problem passing an item-by-item review at the committee level, despite objections from the Democratic Progressive Party-led opposition.
So, the KMT’s persistent refusal to have the pact undergo an item-by-item committee review only works to foster public doubt and raises one fundamental question — What is the content of the pact that the Ma government does not want Taiwanese to know?
More importantly, if the cross-strait service trade agreement, signed without transparency, prior public consent or oversight, could be rushed through committee review without any scrutiny and then clear the legislative floor, it would set a terrible — if not frightening — precedent for any future cross-strait accords.
What if cross-strait agreements such as military confidence-building mechanisms and peace accords are also concluded without the consent of the Taiwanese people? This is a scary thought.
Taiwan’s status in the world community is experiencing something really different; it’s being treated like a normal country. And not just a “normal” country, more like a valuable, constructive, democratic and generous country. This is not simply an artifact of Taiwan’s successes in combatting the novel coronavirus. It is a new attitude, weighing Taiwan’s democracy against China’s lack of it. Before I continue, I should apologize to the readers of the Taipei Times. I have not visited Taipei since the opening of the American Institute in Taiwan’s new chancery building in Neihu last year, so I was unprepared for the photograph
On Sept. 27, 2002, the Democratic Republic of Timor-Leste (East Timor) joined the UN to become its 191st member. Since then, two other nations have joined, Montenegro on June 28, 2006, and South Sudan on July 14, 2011. The combined total of the populations of these three nations is just more than half that of Taiwan’s 23.7 million people. East Timor has 1.3 million, Montenegro has slightly more than half a million and South Sudan has 10.9 million. They all are members of the UN, yet much more populous Taiwan is denied membership. Of the three, East Timor, as a Southeast Asian
At a June 12 news conference held by the Talent Circulation Alliance to announce the release of its white paper for this year, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) emphasized that, in this era of globalization, Taiwan should focus on improving foreign language and digital abilities when cultivating talent, so that it stands out from global competitors. I suggest the government should consider building a professional translation industry. If the public believes that there is a relationship between learning English and national competitiveness, then the nation must consider the social cost of language education. This should be assessed to maximise educational effectiveness: Is
There have been media reports that the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) plans to hold military exercises in August to simulate seizing the Pratas Islands (Dongsha Islands, 東沙群島) in the South China Sea. In the past, only Coast Guard Administration (CGA) personnel have been stationed there, but the Ministry of National Defense has dispatched the Republic of China Marine Corps to the islands, nominally for “ex-situ training,” to prevent a Chinese attack under the guise of military drills. The move is only a temporary measure and not sufficiently proactive. Instead, the government should officially declare sovereignty over the islands and station troops