Why did police attack Chou?
In the small hours of Monday morning, when riot police violently expelled the students who broke into the Executive Yuan, one small figure stood in front of the police, trying to protect the unarmed students from harm.
This small figure was Taiwan Solidarity Union (TSU) Legislator Chou Ni-an (周倪安).
However, a riot policeman used his shield to attack her and when she fell, the police even trampled on her chest.
The attack fractured the bone beneath the lawmaker’s right eye and she was hospitalized.
Chou has tried her best to protect the students from getting hurt by the police since the first night protesters rose up against President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) dictatorship.
She wore a vest showing the TSU logo and her identity as a lawmaker. When the riot police attacked her they could see it and they knew quite well that they were attacking a lawmaker.
This is an atrocity by the ruling machine of Ma. It is no less heinous than those of the Maidan butchers in Kiev or those of Tiananmen Square in 1989.
People may ask why the protesters rose up.
First, they were angered by Ma’s insistence on the passage of the trade pact between Taiwan and China, by his arrogance and by his denial of basic human rights.
These are also the reasons the students chose to occupy the legislative chamber.
The students were even more incensed by Ma’s blatant lies to the media at the international press conference in the morning they broke into the Legislative Yuan.
In fact, the students chanted “peace” as their main slogan.
They were empty-handed, let alone carrying any weapons. And at the time the riot police launched the attack, most students just sat on the ground.
However, the police still used cudgels and high-pressure water cannons to attack the students and protesters.
The protesters are absolutely not rioters. The real rioters are in fact the riot police.
Nonetheless, the riot police were nothing but the criminal tools of Ma. Ma is the real black hand behind the scene. He is the real principal conspirator.
Unfortunately, during the past three decades, Taiwan has never really democratized; the rulers have scarcely followed the rule of law.
Ma is the worst such ruler.
The police still do not acknowledge that they take their pay from the taxpayers, whom they should really serve.
The protesters, including the students, are our compatriots. They are not the enemies of the police.
It is Ma who has made all this trouble.
He is the main culprit. He is the one who bears all the responsibility.
He is also the one who should pay.
Member of International Federation of Journalists and Taiwan Association of Journalists
With a new White House document in May — the “Strategic Approach to the People’s Republic of China” — the administration of US President Donald Trump has firmly set its hyper-competitive line to tackle geoeconomic and geostrategic rivalry, followed by several reinforcing speeches by Trump and other Cabinet-level officials. By identifying China as a near-equal rival, the strategy resonates well with the bipartisan consensus on China in today’s severely divided US. In the face of China’s rapidly growing aggression, the move is long overdue, yet relevant for the maintenance of the international “status quo.” The strategy seems to herald a new
To say that this year has been eventful for China and the rest of the world would be something of an understatement. First, the US-China trade dispute, already simmering for two years, reached a boiling point as Washington tightened the noose around China’s economy. Second, China unleashed the COVID-19 pandemic on the world, wreaking havoc on an unimaginable scale and turning the People’s Republic of China into a common target of international scorn. Faced with a mounting crisis at home, Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) rashly decided to ratchet up military tensions with neighboring countries in a misguided attempt to divert the
Toward the end of former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) final term in office, there was much talk about his legacy. Ma himself would likely prefer history books to enshrine his achievements in reducing cross-strait tensions. He might see his meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Singapore in 2015 as the high point. However, given his statements in the past few months, he might be remembered more for contributing to the breakup of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). We are still talking about Ma and his legacy because it is inextricably tied to the so-called “1992 consensus” as the bedrock of his
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) on Sept. 6 finished its annual national congress. However, if Taiwan wants to have a viable opposition party in its democracy, the results were far from satisfying. The KMT again seems to be caught in a time loop, like that one in the 1993 film Groundhog Day. Yet, unlike the protagonist in that film, the KMT seems unable to learn from past experience and change for the better. Instead, it remains locked in its never-ending cycle of repeating the past. To borrow from a different artistic genre, the KMT echoes Pete Seeger’s song Where Have All