Protesters want democracy
Not many people are aware of or clear on the situation, but student activists are still occupying the Legislative Yuan. They are still going strong, despite warnings from President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) that they will be evacuated by force. People all over the nation are taking peaceful stands. The question is: What are they protesting for?
This is not as simple as being against the cross-strait service trade agreement; Taiwanese are standing up against Ma’s anti-democratic practices. Stakeholders were not consulted before the deal was signed, and it was passed by a joint legislative committee within 30 seconds according to Ma’s instructions, despite promises to have it examined line-by-line. Neither the public nor the people who may potentially suffer from the pact had been informed.
Taiwanese are fighting for redemocratization, and the service trade agreement was only the trigger. It is not that they are against free trade, regardless of what the media or government says. People are perfectly capable of accepting trade deals, as long as they are established in a democratic means and the decisions, process and contents are transparent.
The nature of the pact is predatory. It allows big companies to prey on small and medium-sized enterprises. Only a minority of people already better off than most will benefit from the agreement. Taiwanese believe that trade liberalization should leave nobody behind.
Here is a cautionary vision: If Ma shoots or harms any of the students, Taiwan may be plunged into a Crimea scenario, during which an even larger scale of mass protest may topple his regime. Like former Ukrainian president Viktor Yanukovych, who defected to Russia, will Ma seek help from China and destroy Taiwan’s democracy once and for all?
Huang Yi-jen
Taipei high-school student
China must build trust
The Taipei Times editorial (“Nothing matters without trust,” March 24, page 8) put President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration and the legislative chamber protests into perspective. Evidence exists that a deepening mistrust of China’s dealings with Hong Kong — and the impact on its society — may have played a role in initiating the protests in Taiwan. The fact that many Hong Kongers joined protests against the Mainland and Hong Kong Closer Economic Partnership Arrangement (CEPA, a trade agreement signed in 2003), was a testimonial to their distrust of mainland China and a warning to Taiwan.
Taiwan has a legitimate concern about China after observing the harm suffered by Hong Kong with the broken promises in the CEPA deal. The protests are a compound effect of an unpopular president (whose approval rating had dropped to 9 percent) attempting to push through a trade pact at the wrong time.
First, the introduction of the CEPA in Hong Kong was a devastating experience for its democracy. Hong Kong signed the CEPA on the basis of mainland China’s guarantee that pre-1997-era democracy would remain unchanged for 50 years. Unfortunately, China failed to deliver on its promise, tightening control of the media, intervening in elections and demanding substantial accommodations for mainland Chinese. China damaged its credit and trustworthiness in the CEPA affair.
Second, the confidence and trust across the Taiwan Strait have been dismal even with the recent increase in exchanges. Statistics provided by the public and private sectors have revealed that even with increased bilateral interaction between the two nations, there has been a steady decline of those in favor of eventual unification. Many Taiwanese have experienced Chinese visitors to the nation firsthand and expressed their dissatisfaction in the polls with their behavior.
Third, Taiwan underwent the second-longest period of martial law in history, during which it was separated from China. Its democracy and economy substantially improved during that era of separation. People are cautious of losing the values that they fought long and hard to establish, including a free press, religious and political freedom and multi-party elections. With the failure of democracy in Hong Kong and the declining interest among Taiwanese for reunification, it is incumbent upon China to build a stronger case of its being trustworthy before it attempts any further engagement with Taiwan.
Given Taiwan’s compounded distrust of China, the government should create a forum for deliberation and engage interested parties for any political discourse on major policies — including business policies — involving China to build consensus.
Hsu Chieh-wen
San Diego, California
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US