In these days of high-speed connectivity, 24-hour news, tweeting, Skyping, omnipresent surveillance cameras, instantaneous coverage of war zones, invasive monitoring by national intelligence agencies and even apps to find lost cellphones, it is hard to believe that a commercial airliner could simply vanish.
Malaysia Airlines flight MH370 disappeared one week ago — a week filled with anguish and growing anger for the families and friends of the 239 people aboard the Boeing 777 and frustration for those helping search efforts. The search area has expanded to more than 92,000km2, and into the Indian Ocean, using scores of ships and airplanes and hours of satellite imagery. While authorities appear to be no closer to pinpointing where the plane disappeared, several lessons are clear.
The specter of terrorism raised by the use of stolen passports by two passengers appears not to be a factor in the plane’s disappearance, but it is clear that not every country and airline use Interpol’s database. Considering how much personal information airline passengers must provide when purchasing tickets, checking passport details against Interpol’s list of stolen or missing passports should be elementary.
The need for improved aircraft monitoring technology was cited at the end of the investigation into the crash of Air France Flight 447, which plunged into the Atlantic Ocean after departing Brazil on June 1, 2009, killing all 228 people on board. It took almost two years to find the wreckage of the Airbus 330 and a majority of the bodies. The final report released two years ago recommended improved international communications systems to ensure swifter response and recovery efforts after accidents at sea.
Most nations’ air traffic control systems use radar networks built decades ago that do not provide adequate oceanic coverage. There has been an effort by some countries to create satellite-based tracking systems, but these are some years away. However, technology already exists for aircraft to transmit information in emergencies, but airlines have been reluctant to invest because of the costs.
A concentrated international effort to build satellite and beacon systems that every nation and airline could access is necessary, as is the requirement that airlines upgrade their data transmission equipment.
Malaysia Airlines and the Malaysian government have been caught unprepared by the incident. The lack of crisis-response training has been made painfully clear. Yes, they are dealing with an unprecedented disaster, but Malaysian Acting Transport Minister Hishammuddin Hussein’s repeated assertions that the government is releasing the most up-to-date and accurate information have been just as consistently contradicted. Many questions will not be answered unless the plane’s black box is found, but the inadequate response from Kuala Lumpur has only fed speculations, not quelled them. Every government needs to invest in crisis response and management training — and then pray it never needs to use it.
That being said, one disconcerting note over the past week has been the hubris shown in the Chinese government’s criticism of Malaysia’s lack of “transparency.”
Beijing may be playing to its domestic audience with such comments, but a government that minimizes, covers up and even blacks out information about disasters — earthquakes and train derailments, among others — has no grounds to complain about data provided by others. Such comments do little to help the families of people who are missing.
This week has made it clear how much remains to be done in the area of aviation disaster response. It will take concerted international effort and many of the necessary steps will be costly, but there are no longer any excuses for not taking action. With current technology, there is no reason to let another airliner vanish over an ocean or to leave families wondering about the fates of their loved ones.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers