Is Taiwan the next Crimea?
Is Russian President Vladimir Putin trying to recreate a Russian empire of sorts?
After waiting for the Sochi Winter Olympics to end, Putin waltzed into the Ukraine to take over the Crimean Peninsula. US President Barack Obama’s seemingly feeble response to this — carefully worded to omit any reference to protecting Ukraine from a Russian invasion — has left many shaking their heads and wondering about Putin’s imperial ambitions. After all, the invasion violates an agreement that the US and the UK are party to.
Having taken any military option off the table, Obama has left only sanctions and diplomacy as solutions, basically hoping to “unring the bell” in Crimea — good luck with that.
Clearly, even if Russia withdraws, it will come out ahead from this episode, which will undoubtedly include compromising Crimea’s integrity and independence in some way, such as with a port agreement or some form of regional autonomy.
Moscow has been playing chess in world politics since Putin began flexing his imperial muscles in Georgia, Crimea, Iran, Syria, China, North Korea, Venezuela, Cuba, the Middle East and anywhere else where it can act as an obstacle to Washington. It is just like old times, despite Obama’s statement before the last US election that the Cold War was long over.
Obama does not play chess; he is content to color in his “The World is Singing Together” coloring book. Pundits say that the world is united against Russia on the crisis in Ukraine.
Many have said that China, which strongly defends its territorial integrity, will bridle at Russia’s foray into the peninsula. However, Beijing is probably keenly watching Washington’s response, measuring just how committed the US is to helping an ally whose territory is being invaded and annexed by another power based on the thin justification of “protecting its citizens in that country from aggression.”
The Chinese military leaders looking at Taiwan and licking their lips will draw strong parallels between the situation in the Ukraine and across the Taiwan Strait. Crimea is a highly strategic strip of land blocking Russian access to the sea that acts more or less like a cork.
Taiwan is in a similar position. It is essentially the most important aircraft carrier in the world, since it not only blocks China’s access to the open sea and its imperial intentions, but also serves as a free and democratic reminder to the totalitarian regime in Beijing that ethnic Chinese and Taiwanese can have a democratic government, human rights and live under the rule of law.
Yet there are those in Taiwan who consider themselves part of China and would welcome the nation’s annexation, just as Russia appears to have done to Crimea. The parallel is more than just a little scary.
Far from criticizing Russia’s foray, China will stand back and say nothing, watching with interest how the situation plays out and perhaps moving its chess pieces around as a result.
Moscow plays chess, and so does Beijing. Washington needs to toss out Obama’s coloring book and sustain its ability to prevent, meet and counter unwarranted and unbridled aggression in concert with NATO, the EU, its international allies and the UN. Obama has given every indication over the past six years that he has no stomach for contact sport. This has encouraged adventurers such as Russia, China, Iran, North Korea and others to flex their muscles.
The US does not need to use its military might to curb these shows of strength, it just needs to put this power on the chess board and make other players believe in the consequences — economic or otherwise — they may face if they cross the “red lines” that Obama is fond of mentioning, but which have never materialized.
Russia’s violation of its 1994 treaty with the Ukraine, US and UK should be one such line. What will the rest of the world think if Putin blithely violates the pact as though treaties with the US mean nothing, and Obama discusses it with reporters like he is analyzing soup?
Taiwanese should watch what unfolds in Crimea and the Ukraine with keen interest. It could be the writing on the wall for the nation. Under present conditions, there is little assurance from the US that it will not stand idly by and watch as China waltzes into Taipei. As with Crimea, that would be a very difficult bell to unring.
Lee Long-hwa
Los Angeles, California
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US