The day before the Hong Kong Journalists Association’s (HKJA) rally for press freedom last month, Next Media Group’s Apple Daily Web sites in Taiwan and Hong Kong were brought down by hackers. These attacks were no accidents: They were well-planned and many people linked them to Chinese hackers. The question is what purpose these attacks served. Were they a warning to Next Media Group chairman Jimmy Lai (黎智英) and his newspapers, to the association or to the people of Hong Kong?
The HKJA launched the rally after a series of crackdowns on press freedom in Hong Kong. First, some Chinese advertisers abruptly withdrew their advertisements from both Apple Daily and am730, another Chinese-language Hong Kong newspaper. Next, Ming Pao editor-in-chief Kevin Lau (劉進圖) was suddenly removed, to be replaced by Malaysian journalist Chong Tien Siong (鍾天祥). Then there was Commercial Radio Hong Kong’s roughshod sacking of talk-show host Li Wei-ling (李慧玲). In November last year, the station stirred up controversy by transferring Li to an evening show after she repeatedly criticized Hong Kong Chief Executive Leung Chun-ying (梁振英). Less then three months later, she was brutally fired.
These purges have been targeted because these media outlets have opposed the Hong Kong government and Beijing — some more, some less. Many insightful people in Hong Kong sense that this is not simply a question of whether the media are turning “red,” but is a restriction on both speech and press freedom. In the past, China tried to change things slowly to let people adjust, but now it is bringing it all on full-throttle.
With Beijing making such a big effort to purge the Hong Kong media, it is clear it has Leung’s backing. It should also be noted that the Education Bureau of Hong Kong defined Cantonese as a “dialect” earlier this year. Clearly, the bureau acted on the instructions of China’s State General Administration of Press, Publication, Radio, Film and Television. Following strong public protests, the bureau removed the controversial language, but still essentially follows the policy of “biliteracy [Chinese and English] and trilingualism [Mandarin, Cantonese and English]” (兩文三語) under the Basic Law of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (香港特區基本法) and continues to promote the learning of Mandarin.
In Hong Kong today, the Chinese influence and authoritarian approach is everywhere. For example, the Hong Kong government tried to launch a three-year national education course on patriotism for elementary-school students in July 2012 and a history textbook published in August last year for high-school students even suggested an exercise in which students play the role of a Chinese Communist Party member persuading others to join the party. The brainwashing has penetrated Hong Kong’s educational system. It is only a matter of time before Beijing gains complete control of the freedom of expression and press freedom, especially as Leung loyally executes Beijing’s orders. No wonder he avoided a journalist’s question about the HKJA’s call for press freedom by pretending not to hear it during a press conference not long ago.
The attacks against the Apple Daily’s Web sites were indeed a warning. China’s attacks on thought and its control of the press will become more intense and direct. Hong Kongers should stage strong protests to safeguard their last line of defense — press freedom.
How should Taiwanese view these developments? How should the nation respond to these calls for freedom and democracy and what assistance should it offer?
Kung Ling-shin is an associate professor in the Department of Journalism at Ming Chuan University.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US