The day before the Hong Kong Journalists Association’s (HKJA) rally for press freedom last month, Next Media Group’s Apple Daily Web sites in Taiwan and Hong Kong were brought down by hackers. These attacks were no accidents: They were well-planned and many people linked them to Chinese hackers. The question is what purpose these attacks served. Were they a warning to Next Media Group chairman Jimmy Lai (黎智英) and his newspapers, to the association or to the people of Hong Kong?
The HKJA launched the rally after a series of crackdowns on press freedom in Hong Kong. First, some Chinese advertisers abruptly withdrew their advertisements from both Apple Daily and am730, another Chinese-language Hong Kong newspaper. Next, Ming Pao editor-in-chief Kevin Lau (劉進圖) was suddenly removed, to be replaced by Malaysian journalist Chong Tien Siong (鍾天祥). Then there was Commercial Radio Hong Kong’s roughshod sacking of talk-show host Li Wei-ling (李慧玲). In November last year, the station stirred up controversy by transferring Li to an evening show after she repeatedly criticized Hong Kong Chief Executive Leung Chun-ying (梁振英). Less then three months later, she was brutally fired.
These purges have been targeted because these media outlets have opposed the Hong Kong government and Beijing — some more, some less. Many insightful people in Hong Kong sense that this is not simply a question of whether the media are turning “red,” but is a restriction on both speech and press freedom. In the past, China tried to change things slowly to let people adjust, but now it is bringing it all on full-throttle.
With Beijing making such a big effort to purge the Hong Kong media, it is clear it has Leung’s backing. It should also be noted that the Education Bureau of Hong Kong defined Cantonese as a “dialect” earlier this year. Clearly, the bureau acted on the instructions of China’s State General Administration of Press, Publication, Radio, Film and Television. Following strong public protests, the bureau removed the controversial language, but still essentially follows the policy of “biliteracy [Chinese and English] and trilingualism [Mandarin, Cantonese and English]” (兩文三語) under the Basic Law of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (香港特區基本法) and continues to promote the learning of Mandarin.
In Hong Kong today, the Chinese influence and authoritarian approach is everywhere. For example, the Hong Kong government tried to launch a three-year national education course on patriotism for elementary-school students in July 2012 and a history textbook published in August last year for high-school students even suggested an exercise in which students play the role of a Chinese Communist Party member persuading others to join the party. The brainwashing has penetrated Hong Kong’s educational system. It is only a matter of time before Beijing gains complete control of the freedom of expression and press freedom, especially as Leung loyally executes Beijing’s orders. No wonder he avoided a journalist’s question about the HKJA’s call for press freedom by pretending not to hear it during a press conference not long ago.
The attacks against the Apple Daily’s Web sites were indeed a warning. China’s attacks on thought and its control of the press will become more intense and direct. Hong Kongers should stage strong protests to safeguard their last line of defense — press freedom.
How should Taiwanese view these developments? How should the nation respond to these calls for freedom and democracy and what assistance should it offer?
Kung Ling-shin is an associate professor in the Department of Journalism at Ming Chuan University.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Burger King Taiwan on Wednesday last week posted an update on Facebook advertising a new “Wuhan pneumonia” (武漢肺炎) home delivery meal, catering to customers hankering for a Whopper, but who wished to avoid visiting one of its outlets. “Wuhan pneumonia” is the term commonly used in Taiwan to describe COVID-19. Beijing has been waging an extensive propaganda campaign against the use of the words “Wuhan” or “China” in reference to the novel coronavirus, calling it racist and discriminatory. Meanwhile, Chinese officials have claimed that the coronavirus might have originated in the US. The intention is obvious: to distract attention from the Chinese Communist
Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) Air Force Shaanxi KJ-500 airborne early-warning aircraft and Shenyang J-11 fighters on March 16 conducted a nighttime exercise in the waters southwest of Taiwan and, in doing so, came close to the nation’s air defense identification zone. Three days later, the PLA Navy’s fleet for Gulf of Aden escort mission sailed north in the Pacific off Taiwan’s east coast via the Miyako Strait on its way home. Meanwhile, the US carried out freedom of navigation operations in the South China Sea and assembled the USS Theodore Roosevelt carrier strike group with the Expeditionary Strike Group to conduct
Having returned to the UK late last year and with a Taiwanese spouse remaining in Taiwan, I have been afforded the chance to compare and contrast the UK and Taiwanese governments’ responses to the COVID-19 crisis. My early conclusions are that Taiwan benefits from a rational, competent government, which quickly recognizes, adapts to and confronts large-scale disasters. It is led by a government that does more than just talk of respecting democracy and human rights, one that is scrutinized and responds to criticism, one that is concerned about public opinion, and one that is used to dealing with emergencies on
Italy, Spain, France, the UK and the US are all depending on social distancing to fight COVID-19 and have fallen into terrible situations, with mounting positive cases and many deaths. Social distancing might flatten the curve, so that the peak is not so high that hospitals are overwhelmed with patients, the problem is that the pandemic could extend further into the future, hurt the economy more and become unbearable for society. Taiwan, South Korea, Japan and Singapore have controlled the spread of COVID-19, and the main reason is that most Asians wear masks. It can be illustrated as follows: If someone contracts the