Former National Science Council minister Cyrus Chu (朱敬一) recently said that when it comes to environmental protection and economic development, it seems that it is possible only to have one or the other, which results in both sides losing out.
Filmmaker Chi Po-lin (齊柏林), who directed the documentary Beyond Beauty: Taiwan from Above (看見台灣), has similarly expressed concern that Taiwan offers no future for either its environment or its economic development.
I am in California, researching the restoration of salt ponds in the San Francisco Bay Area. Over the nearly five decades since the San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission was established, it has succeeded in protecting the ecology of the city’s bay while allowing the local economy to flourish. Taiwan could learn a lot from this organization.
In the early 1960s, the San Francisco Bay seemed like a dump, with the US Army Corps of Engineers planning to fill it in and reclaim the land. This prompted three women who were worried about the loss of the area’s beautiful scenery to set up the commission under the California state government.
The commission unifies the nine counties and more than 40 towns and cities — including San Francisco, Oakland and San Jose — that the Bay Area encompasses. A single county or city government in charge of conservation efforts would not have been authoritative or representative enough to protect the area. Establishing the conservation body under the state government made it possible to decree that all conservation and development projects in the region had to be approved by the commission’s 27 members.
Five members, including the commission chairperson and vice chairperson, are appointed by the state governor, while four city representatives are appointed by the Association of Bay Area Governments. Remaining members are appointed by the State Assembly and local governments. Some members also represent environmental groups. All appointees are volunteers.
The commission includes volunteer design and engineering review boards responsible for technical examinations of conservation and development projects. The commission also has 45 full-time administrative staff.
The commission has given the Bay Area a complete makeover. As well as conserving the environment, it has restored many salt ponds and protected wetlands. In the leisure sector, it has established several large parks and an 800km network of biking and hiking trails that are managed by the Bay Trail Project, which is subordinate to the Association of Bay Area Governments. The commission has enabled the Bay Area to be developed in many functional respects, while taking into account conservation, leisure, flood prevention and rising sea levels associated with global warming.
Although, like California, Taiwan has government agencies for ecological management, such as national park administrations and the Forestry Bureau, they are all part of the bureaucratic structure and are in charge of both management and planning. This makes it hard for these agencies to perform their management roles well and weakens their planning capacities.
The local situation differs from California’s, where the commission plays a managing role and has members from diverse cultural backgrounds. More importantly, all commission discussions are open and transparent. Biweekly meetings are open to public participation and their agendas must be announced 10 days in advance.
The commission’s structure and success offer useful lessons for Taiwan.
Yang Yung-nane is a visiting researcher at the University of California, Berkeley.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers
Gogoro Inc was once a rising star and a would-be unicorn in the years prior to its debut on the NASDAQ in 2022, as its environmentally friendly technology and stylish design attracted local young people. The electric scooter and battery swapping services provider is bracing for a major personnel shakeup following the abrupt resignation on Friday of founding chairman Horace Luke (陸學森) as chief executive officer. Luke’s departure indicates that Gogoro is sinking into the trough of unicorn disillusionment, with the company grappling with poor financial performance amid a slowdown in demand at home and setbacks in overseas expansions. About 95