It is a fundamental principle of the Republic of China’s Constitution that citizens have the right to live, the right to work and the right to own property. And because providing a decent living environment is one of the government’s major obligations, people have the right to know whether the government has done its job right.
That is why the recent comments by TV host Sisy Chen (陳文茜) on the dire conditions facing Taiwanese youth and several stories in Chinese-language CommonWealth Magazine have generated heated discussion on Internet bulletin boards and some TV news programs.
In a commentary published on Feb. 15 in the Chinese-language Apple Daily, Chen said this country should feel sorry about what it has done to the youth, referring to what she perceives as a lack of social justice in both economic development and the housing market.
Chen was referring to Taipei’s out-of-control housing market, where prices have risen so quickly that few in the younger generation are able to purchase a home in the city. One of her points is that an incompetent government and interest groups have, since 2008, placed their desires above the general public’s interests, resulting in the hollowing-out of local industry, a society far poorer than before and falling competitiveness for the nation as a whole.
Chen’s article met with mixed responses, with some people echoing her view that surging home prices have topped their concerns for many years, while others criticized what they see as her hypocrisy, because she did not offer any solution. While she vented her anger, she was not calling for a popular revolt against this government; instead her article was simply concluded with a sigh of lament about “the youth.”
Criticism aside, Chen took note of the key issues facing younger people: low wages and a bleak future, which have been exacerbated by the government’s 2009 introduction of a NT$22,000 monthly subsidy for businesses to hire college graduates.
While Taiwanese firms continue to move overseas, meaning they are making smaller contributions to domestic hiring and wages, the government’s subsidy program has pushed more businesses to offer first-time jobseekers pay as low as NT$22,000 a month, deepening the stagnation of wages.
Following Chen’s commentary, CommonWealth published a series of stories about some young Taiwanese seeking entry-level employment in Singapore and how South Korea’s government assists unemployed young people in finding decent jobs overseas as part of its national development strategy, hinting at the sharp differences between those two nations and Taiwan in the treatment of the younger generation.
The issue of youth unemployment is much more severe than the overall jobless situation in this nation. According to the latest government data, the jobless rate fell to 4.02 percent in January, the lowest level since June 2008, but youth unemployment rate for the 20-24 age group was more than triple that of the whole workforce, at 13.18 percent, followed by 9.67 percent for the 15-19 age group and 6.84 percent for the 25-29 age group.
As in many other countries, youth unemployment is an issue unlikely to be solved in the short term, because it results from structural changes associated with the nation’s economic development in the past decade. The crisis is that as long as the number of young people stuck in working poverty grows, more will seek jobs overseas, which increases the likelihood of Taiwan becoming a labor-exporting nation.
Whether the nation owes the youth an apology is not important. What matters are the social implications, since higher home prices and stagnant wages reinforce economic divisions and income inequality, and an increasingly stratified society is no blessing to the nation.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US