Cities in southern Taiwan are competing to be the site of a new international baseball village, hoping to reinvigorate the sport in the country and lay the foundations for strengthening domestic teams.
The Greater Tainan Government planned to construct an international baseball village in Heshunliao (和順寮), Annan District (安南), but after the bidding process for the contract failed on three separate occasions due to lack of a response, the city decided to skip the planning and estimates stages and jump straight into construction. Meanwhile, it sent a planning committee to the US to observe spring training centers and baseball stadium facilities.
The Greater Kaohsiung Department of Sports, having revisited plans to build a baseball village in Gangshan District (岡山), has decided that the outline needs to be reviewed to ensure that newly constructed facilities there do not become just another vacant mosquito breeding ground.
Meanwhile, in Chiayi City, local baseball aficionados wanted to see the city government build a “Taiwanese Williamsport” — after Williamsport, the birthplace of Little League Baseball in Pennsylvania — near the Lantan Reservoir (蘭潭水庫). Nothing has come of this either.
Good intentions are great, but it is also important to get the policy right. There are three main problems with the idea of having an international baseball village.
First, there is some doubt as to whether the authorities have what it takes to implement the policy. The financial resources available to local governments are insufficient for the range of facilities and support that an international baseball village would require and the national Sports Administration’s concerns that the initiative would end up with just more disused buildings, or as an excuse to line the pockets of corrupt officials, might have it all descend into a game of passing the buck.
Second, the policy would require extenisve planning and several kinds of expertise — regarding coaching philosophies and the development of umpires, talent scouts and qualified sports injury prevention and first-aid professionals — that are not available here.
The development of baseball faces many challenges and, although it is painful to say, the prospect of international success in tournaments in the near future remains remote.
Third, there is the issue of how such a sports village would fit in the local area, in terms of the environment, topography, transportation and industry, and what it would mean for other government policies. Perhaps, most important would be the degree to which the international baseball culture would be embraced locally.
Those caveats aside, the creation of an international baseball community need not be a zero-sum game or a competition between separate and isolated entities.
Chiayi could plan for its “Williamsport” to develop little league baseball; Greater Tainan could consider hooking up with baseball teams and building a set of baseball stadiums — modeled on the home of the Baseball Hall of Fame in Cooperstown, New York — in which foreign coaches and players from teams overseas could teach; and an international baseball village in Greater Kaohsiung could concentrate on providing facilities for different levels, like the Hanshin Koshien baseball park near Kobe, Japan.
If involved parties can further differentiate the lines and space between main and secondary stadiums, and upgrade their administration, stands, training, boarding and teaching facilities, this would be great for the development of tourism, catering and industry in the northern part of Kaohsiung.
If these local governments can imagine models for baseball facilities in their respective areas that conform to their own strengths and interests and can cooperate with the others, there is no reason that the Sports Administration should not welcome the plans.
The Sports Administration should support and encourage the local governments in the south to take the initiative on this vast project, which can only be good for the development of Taiwanese baseball.
Mark Lin is an assistant research fellow at the Taiwan Institute of Economic Research.
Translated by Paul Cooper
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers