On Feb. 2 high school civics and society teachers from around the nation assembled outside the Ministry of Education to protest how the government’s “minor adjustments” to the high school curriculum guidelines ignore due process. Minister of Education Chiang Wei-ling (蔣偉寧), dismissing their objections as a minority view, did not receive their petition and rushed through changes that in no way reflected the views of teachers, declaring the whole process to be constitutional, legal and perfectly in line with procedure.
On Friday last week, Premier Jiang Yi-huah (江宜樺) strenuously defended the minister in the Legislative Yuan, saying the changes conformed to the spirit of the Constitution and that factual errors gave rise to different interpretations that were used for political ends. Perhaps the premier would like to elaborate on how ordinary members of the public are able to manipulate information for political ends when the state apparatus is under the government’s control.
The core demands made by the Civics Teachers Action Alliance have not changed. What we object to is the non-transparent way in which these curriculum adjustments were decided upon. We are calling on the ministry to implement procedural justice. This has nothing to do with political affiliation, or a position vis-a-vis independence from or unification with China. It is something all civics teachers can understand and identify with.
For the past 10 years or so, amendments to the curriculum guidelines have first been proposed by the ministry and then subjected to a set procedure, and only passed after consensus has been forged over a period of time.
This time, the ministry has invented an entirely different procedure. It has set up a — legally questionable — curriculum guidelines “review group” to decide whether the present guidelines are “constitutional” and, ignoring the opinions of teachers who teach the subject, hammered out these changes behind closed doors, and forced them through.
Several days ago, alliance members applied for access — according to the Freedom of Government Information Law (政府資訊公開法) — to the minutes of the 12-year national basic education curriculum review committee, together with information on the committee’s votes, to get to the bottom of things. The ministry’s reply was that the minutes of the meeting belong to the ministry, were preparatory in nature and confidential. If you want an example of political manipulation, you need look no further than how the ministry refuses access to information.
The alliance is calling on civics teachers nationwide to join us outside the ministry tomorrow and on Saturday, to demand — before it is too late — that the government listen to public opinion, respect academic expertise, restart the public hearing process and reinstate procedural justice.
Chou Wei-tung and Kao Chuan-po are civics teachers at high schools and members of the Civics Teachers Action Alliance.
Translated by Paul Cooper
With a new White House document in May — the “Strategic Approach to the People’s Republic of China” — the administration of US President Donald Trump has firmly set its hyper-competitive line to tackle geoeconomic and geostrategic rivalry, followed by several reinforcing speeches by Trump and other Cabinet-level officials. By identifying China as a near-equal rival, the strategy resonates well with the bipartisan consensus on China in today’s severely divided US. In the face of China’s rapidly growing aggression, the move is long overdue, yet relevant for the maintenance of the international “status quo.” The strategy seems to herald a new
To say that this year has been eventful for China and the rest of the world would be something of an understatement. First, the US-China trade dispute, already simmering for two years, reached a boiling point as Washington tightened the noose around China’s economy. Second, China unleashed the COVID-19 pandemic on the world, wreaking havoc on an unimaginable scale and turning the People’s Republic of China into a common target of international scorn. Faced with a mounting crisis at home, Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) rashly decided to ratchet up military tensions with neighboring countries in a misguided attempt to divert the
Toward the end of former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) final term in office, there was much talk about his legacy. Ma himself would likely prefer history books to enshrine his achievements in reducing cross-strait tensions. He might see his meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Singapore in 2015 as the high point. However, given his statements in the past few months, he might be remembered more for contributing to the breakup of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). We are still talking about Ma and his legacy because it is inextricably tied to the so-called “1992 consensus” as the bedrock of his
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) on Sept. 6 finished its annual national congress. However, if Taiwan wants to have a viable opposition party in its democracy, the results were far from satisfying. The KMT again seems to be caught in a time loop, like that one in the 1993 film Groundhog Day. Yet, unlike the protagonist in that film, the KMT seems unable to learn from past experience and change for the better. Instead, it remains locked in its never-ending cycle of repeating the past. To borrow from a different artistic genre, the KMT echoes Pete Seeger’s song Where Have All