Following his recent meeting with former vice president and former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairman Lien Chan (連戰), Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) gave a four-point speech deserving attention.
It was Xi’s first public speech on the cross-strait situation following the meeting between Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) Minister Wang Yu-chi (王郁琦) and China’s Taiwan Affairs Office (TAO) Minister Zhang Zhijun (張志軍). It was also the first time since Xi came to power that he proposed a more complete view of Taiwan policy and cross-strait relations. This view is likely to serve as a guideline for the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) Taiwan policy in the future.
These are the issues in his speech that require close inspection.
First, although Xi continued to play on national sentiment and the idea that the two sides of the Taiwan Strait are part of one big family, he was more careful in his wording. Departing from a more self-centered approach, he used positive language such as “cross-strait mutual understanding,” “efforts,” “sharing” and “beginning.”
He added various features of Taiwan’s history, society, traditions and culture to his discourse to gain Taiwanese recognition and support.
Xi also emphasized that although we cannot choose the past, we can seize the moment and be open to the future.
This approach shows that he is confident and that he understands Taiwan. As he continues to promote the “Chinese dream,” he will also stress the construction of a Taiwanese and a cross-strait dream and their connection to the Chinese dream.
Second, Xi reiterated that, on the basis of peaceful and stable cross-strait relations, the two sides should embrace the so-called “1992 consensus” and oppose Taiwanese independence in order to consolidate the “one China” framework.
Although this call was in the political report of the CCP’s 18th Central Committee, it was the first time that Xi mentioned the “1992 consensus” in a public speech. For more than a year, the world has been worried that Xi might attempt to replace the “1992 consensus” with the “one China” framework.
Today, following the meetings between Wang and Zhang and between Lien and Xi, it seems Beijing also supports the “1992 consensus” that President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration has always upheld. For mutual political trust as well as other cross-strait dialogue, there is still room for interpretation of the “1992 consensus.”
Third, Xi praised the “Wang-Zhang meeting,” saying that it was meaningful for the overall development of cross-strait relations.
Judging from the praise for the meeting from Ma, Xi, Taiwanese in general and the international community, we can expect Zhang to visit Taiwan, as well as further contact and cooperation between the authorities on the two sides of the Taiwan Strait.
In particular, Beijing is hosting this year’s APEC summit.
Regardless of whether a meeting between Ma and Xi takes place at the meeting, the fact that Xi has included the cross-strait dream in the Chinese dream implies that contacts and cooperation will continue between ministerial-level officials in Taiwan and China. Political issues might, of course, also be discussed.
Fourth, when dealing with cross-strait developments, China hopes to get rid of the nightmare presented by Taiwan’s direct presidential election every four years.
Even Xi, a highly confident nationalist leader, will face the CCP’s 19th Central Committee in 2017, which will carry out a review of his Taiwan policy.
Given these circumstances, he has reiterated that Beijing is willing to engage in exchanges with Taiwan’s pan-green camp, so they can work together to push for the peaceful development of cross-strait relations.
As for the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) chairmanship election in May and the direction of the party’s China policy, the CCP may be reluctant to engage in party-to-party exchanges, but hopes to interact with individual members to push for changes in the DPP’s China policy.
Beijing’s expectations in this respect are high.
Xi’s personal leadership characteristics and decisionmaking style and his demonstration that there is a possibility for change in China’s Taiwan policy imply that he might take a more active and aggressive approach.
As Taiwan’s government and opposition focus mainly on the seven-in-one local elections in November, they should also examine possible opportunities and challenges that could result from any such changes.
Andy Chang is director of the Graduate Institute of China Studies at Tamkang University.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers