There have been several different divisions and tensions during the six decades since the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) regime lost the Chinese Civil War and fled to Taiwan — ethnic tensions between Taiwanese and Mainlanders, and ideological tensions between independence and unification, to name two — with some remaining to this day.
Fortunately, it appeared that religious tensions had never been among them.
In Taiwan, where people are predominantly followers of Taoism and Buddhism, seeing a church sitting right next to a temple on the same street is so common that people do not find anything strange about it. Believers of different faiths usually get along without any problem.
However, recent incidents involving comments by several pastors about same-sex marriage; lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) people and issues, and Christianity and other religions have stoked fears that Taiwan’s harmony could be breached.
Astonishing and simply radical remarks made by several religious leaders, in particular after the Legislative Yuan took up discussion of the legalization of same-sex marriage, have drawn public attention.
A YouTube video clip of pastor Kuo Mei-chiang’s (郭美江) speech went viral in December last year.
Kuo was seen telling a congregation that homosexuality is “sorcery” and Christians are encouraged to “keep a distance” from homosexuals.
Kuo also told the audience that God had given her at least five diamonds as a blessing and that Christianity heals skin diseases.
Another YouTube video showed pastor Meng Hsien-mei (孟憲梅) telling her church members that Christianity restores women’s hymens and Santaizi (the third prince, 三太子), a folk god in Taiwanese Taoism, is a “dirty evil spirit.”
Gender-equality education, Meng said, is a “devil’s tool” that pollutes and endangers the younger generation.
The outrageous comments appear to have been so shocking that netizens found more videos documenting radical opinions coming from Christian churches, including another pastor who described the folk goddess Guanyin (觀音) as an evil spirit and a man described as a pastor was caught on tape trying to behead a wooden carving of Guanyin.
The views apparently represent only a few people, as representatives from other churches also raised questions and concerns about the borderline discriminatory remarks.
Society’s view of Christians may have been distorted because of regrettable remarks from some churches staunchly opposing the legalization of same-sex marriage and by the radical comments by some pastors. The reputation of the Christian churches that played an important role in Taiwan’s civilization and democratization has suddenly been tainted.
There are about 600,000 Christians in Taiwan, accounting for about 2.6 percent of the total population of 23 million, according to statistics compiled by the Ministry of the Interior at the end of 2012. While their beliefs and freedom of speech should be respected, the beliefs and freedom of speech of believers of other religions must be respected as well.
The debate about same-sex marriage and LGBT rights in Taiwan is expected to be heated and divisive. Going forward, Taiwanese must remember that derogatory comments are unwelcome and useless in facilitating healthy discussions and building a consensus.
On Sept. 3 in Tiananmen Square, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) rolled out a parade of new weapons in PLA service that threaten Taiwan — some of that Taiwan is addressing with added and new military investments and some of which it cannot, having to rely on the initiative of allies like the United States. The CCP’s goal of replacing US leadership on the global stage was advanced by the military parade, but also by China hosting in Tianjin an August 31-Sept. 1 summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), which since 2001 has specialized
In an article published by the Harvard Kennedy School, renowned historian of modern China Rana Mitter used a structured question-and-answer format to deepen the understanding of the relationship between Taiwan and China. Mitter highlights the differences between the repressive and authoritarian People’s Republic of China and the vibrant democracy that exists in Taiwan, saying that Taiwan and China “have had an interconnected relationship that has been both close and contentious at times.” However, his description of the history — before and after 1945 — contains significant flaws. First, he writes that “Taiwan was always broadly regarded by the imperial dynasties of
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) will stop at nothing to weaken Taiwan’s sovereignty, going as far as to create complete falsehoods. That the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has never ruled Taiwan is an objective fact. To refute this, Beijing has tried to assert “jurisdiction” over Taiwan, pointing to its military exercises around the nation as “proof.” That is an outright lie: If the PRC had jurisdiction over Taiwan, it could simply have issued decrees. Instead, it needs to perform a show of force around the nation to demonstrate its fantasy. Its actions prove the exact opposite of its assertions. A
A large part of the discourse about Taiwan as a sovereign, independent nation has centered on conventions of international law and international agreements between outside powers — such as between the US, UK, Russia, the Republic of China (ROC) and Japan at the end of World War II, and between the US and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) since recognition of the PRC as the sole representative of China at the UN. Internationally, the narrative on the PRC and Taiwan has changed considerably since the days of the first term of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the Democratic
RSS