The decision by the Presidential Office to file a criminal lawsuit against a man who allegedly crashed his gravel truck into the Presidential Office last month and seek compensation for the damage reveals the extent of President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) indifference to public displeasure over his administration. It is an unwise move that will create more distance between the government and its people.
The lawsuit, filed on Wednesday against Chang Te-cheng (張德正), a truck driver who reportedly drove a 35-tonne truck up the front steps of the building and crashed into the gate on Jan. 25, is the first criminal lawsuit filed by the Presidential Office during Ma’s time in office. It seeks NT$3 million (US$98,972) in compensation to cover repair costs.
In defending the legal battle against a civilian, Presidential Office spokesperson Lee Chia-fei (李佳霏) said Chang should take responsibility for the damage he has caused. The Presidential Office building is a monument and it would be unfair for taxpayers to pay for the repairs.
Resolving issues via legal means is Ma’s well-known attitude as a rigid legalist who takes pride in always acting in accordance with the law. However, he has focused only on his own interests and interpreted the law selectively to suit his purposes.
During his terms as Taipei mayor, he interpreted the law to avoid an embezzlement conviction in the case against him regarding the abuse of his mayoral special allowance. As president, he has insisted on the preposterous interpretation of the Republic of China (ROC) Constitution that includes China in the territory of the ROC, while seeking closer cross-strait ties under the so-called “1992 consensus.”
The lawsuit manifests Ma’s failure to understand the public’s frustration with his administration and only raises tensions between them.
The 41-year-old truck driver said there were no political motives behind the truck crash and that his hardships in life were the main reason behind the incident. The Presidential Office’s lawsuit and the compensation request will no doubt put additional heavy economic burdens on him.
On the same day that the Presidential Office filed the lawsuit, prosecutors detained another man suspected of intending to crash his car into the Presidential Office to express his discontent over military injustice.
As part of the Presidential Office’s efforts to improve security around the building, it is considering closing Ketagalan Boulevard, which leads to the building, to avoid similar incidents.
It is in no one’s interest for the Presidential Office to wage a legal war against members of the public or block the roads leading to the building, especially when Ma’s dismal approval rating has failed to rise.
Ma’s approval rating hit a new low of 9.2 percent last year due to poor government policies and his ongoing political feud with Legislative Speaker Wang Jin-pyng (王金平) within the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). In the latest public opinion poll last month, 74.7 percent of respondents said they were not satisfied with Ma’s performance, a record-high disapproval rating for Ma since he took office in May 2008.
The truck crash reflects people’s dissatisfaction with the government for failing to make their lives better. Ma and his administration need to pursue self-reflection, rather than place blame for the incident on the people and avoid responsibilities.
Insisting on resolving the truck crash incident with ruthless legal measures and failing to address public disfavor will not prevent similar incidents. Instead, it will only lead to more protests against the Ma administration and Ma will see his support rate continue to plummet in his final term.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers