King’s ‘one China’ comment
We wish to respond to the Taipei Times report (“King unclear on US ‘one China’ policy: legislator,” Jan. 7, page 1) and a letter to the editor (“Taiwan’s status a done deal,” Jan. 9, page 8). The testimony given by Representative to the US King Pu-tsung (金溥聰) at the Jan. 6 hearing of the Legislative Yuan’s Foreign and National Defense Committee on the US policy toward Taiwan seems to have generated misunderstandings that merit clarification.
It is common knowledge that Beijing, per its “one China” principle, insists that Taiwan is a part of China and the government of the People’s Republic of China (PRC) is the sole legal government representing the whole of China.
Of course, the government of the Republic of China (ROC) rejects that claim. According to our constitution, Taiwan is a part of the ROC.
The historical documents and statements by US officials through eight administrations show its longstanding policy: While providing diplomatic recognition to the PRC, the US only acknowledges the PRC’s position on Taiwan.
In keeping with the Taiwan Relations Act and the Six Assurances, the US has never altered this policy. As Representative King reiterated, referring to the Six Assurances in his testimony, the US has not altered its position regarding sovereignty over Taiwan.
His remarks during the Legislative Yuan’s interpellation were taken out of context and misinterpreted, which is unfortunate and distracts from the pursuit of Taiwan’s important policy objectives.
Press Division
Taipei Economic and Cultural Representative Office in the US
Ma’s master plan strategy
There are more issues involved then “what President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) said at a university presidents’ forum at Kun Shan University in Greater Tainan on Jan. 9 — a remark that reflected Ma’s personality and the characteristics of his administration” (“Ma should get used to disobedience,” Jan. 14, page 8). The matter is not that simple.
There must be reasons:
First, why as president did Ma want to attend the university presidents’ forum, instead of Premier Jiang Yi-huah (江宜樺), who is supposed to be in charge of education?
Second, tuition increases are unpopular with parents of students, why would he openly encourage the presidents of private universities to go ahead and raise tuition?
Ma has a master plan focused on unification with China. Ma was pushing his agenda.
One of his strategies is importing more Chinese students to attend universities in Taiwan. Ma does not want to see private universities in Taiwan go bankrupt and close down.
To increase the number of Chinese students coming to Taiwan, his administration has been working on revising the following laws and regulations:
One, the regulations of the “Three limits and Six noes” to Chinese students.
Two, the Act Governing the Relations Between the Peoples of the Taiwan Area and the Mainland Area (兩岸人民關係條例).
Three, the Employment Services Law (就業服務法).
Mainland Affairs Council Minister Wang Yu-chi (王郁琦) will be going to China to discuss business between the governments of Taiwan and China next month.
One of the items on the agenda must be related to Chinese students coming to Taiwan to study.
Waves of Chinese students, brides and professionals flooding into Taiwan is an effective way to achieve the unification of Taiwan and China.
Ma is liar. He is also a dangerous person.
Before stepping down as president, Ma will make sure Taiwan will be locked into the chain of China.
Ken Huang
Murrieta, California
Successful cave restoration
A recent article documented the hard work of individuals who have restored a bat habitat in the Taichung area (“Taichung bats return after cave renovation,” Jan. 17, page 3). It has taken a long time to prepare the Toubiankeng Cave for the species that once lived there, but was forced out due to weather conditions and floods. Now that bats are back, congratulations to those who worked to restore the cave.
In particular, Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Ho Hsin-chun (何欣純) and Greater Taichung Councilor Huang Hsiu-chu (黃秀珠) have labored to preserve the area for the bat species, the Formosan leaf-nosed bat. Bats serve not only an “auspicious omen,” Huang said, but are an important part of the ecosystem.
As a Westerner living in Taiwan, I have been delighted at the auspicious nature bats symbolize in Chinese cosmology, and every night that I witness bats flying around my Wan Hua neighborhood. I feel fortunate to be able to watch these creatures darting back and forth feeding on those unwanted bugs and mosquitoes.
Dave Hall
Taipei
This article has been corrected since it was first published.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
At the same time as more than 30 military aircraft were detected near Taiwan — one of the highest daily incursions this year — with some flying as close as 37 nautical miles (69kms) from the northern city of Keelung, China announced a limited and selected relaxation of restrictions on Taiwanese agricultural exports and tourism, upon receiving a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) delegation led by KMT legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅崑萁). This demonstrates the two-faced gimmick of China’s “united front” strategy. Despite the strongest earthquake to hit the nation in 25 years striking Hualien on April 3, which caused
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past