It is unfair that I have not grown up to be a leading architect, for it is not as if I did not put in a long apprenticeship. As a child, I was not one for dolls; I always preferred to build. First, there were Stickle Bricks, those bristly chunks of plastic that look and feel like offcuts from a hairbrush factory. Then there was Lego, so frustratingly curveless and yet so infinitely satisfying. Finally, there was Fischertechnik, a German construction toy designed to teach children how machines work.
In our house, the Fischertechnik belonged to my brother, but I would sometimes try it out. Its ugliness horrified me; all cogs and winches, it was mostly black, gray and red. However, it left a lasting impression. I find now that I prefer buildings to be honest. Better “ugly” concrete than ersatz Georgian; better gleaming glass and metal than Quinlan Terry’s tepid, flavorless classicism.
Dame Ann Dowling, who later this year is to be appointed the first female president of the British Royal Academy of Engineering, believes that if girls were encouraged to play with toys such as Lego, more of them might go on to pursue careers like hers.
Illustration: Mountain people
I agree with her. It is not only a person’s future taste that is influenced by construction toys. Nor is it one’s basic understanding of how a bridge might need to be supported or a tower underpinned, things you learn from Lego without even realizing it.
It is one’s sense of possibility. Sitting on the floor surrounded by bricks, a child is an absolute ruler, a miniature city mayor who may make decisions about high rise versus low rise, traffic flow or the number of trees in a certain park, on a whim. She enforces order, here a street and there a house, and is then able to destroy the whole plan and start again. Given the God-like way many architects carry on, it is probably helpful to get a sense of this feeling as early as possible.
However, back to taste. Last year, while I was researching the life of the architect Alison Smithson, I stumbled on the strangest and most beguiling book.
It is called Architecture on the Carpet. Written by Brenda and Robert Vale, who are professors of architecture at Victoria University of Wellington in New Zealand and lifelong collectors of construction toys, it tells the curious story of the connections between children’s building sets and architecture.
What I learned from reading it was this: Not only did some early construction toys mirror the built environment (Lott’s Bricks, which first appeared in 1917, embrace the ethos of the arts and crafts movement, while Tudor Minibrix, a rubber Lego-like toy that was first manufactured in 1935, enabled their owners to build perfect little half-timbered houses). Some modern buildings reflect aspects of the style of the toys their designers played with as children.
The authors say, for instance, that Will Alsop, the architect of Peckham library in south London, played with Bayko as a boy, and that you perhaps see this in the slender columns that support the building (Bayko, patented in Liverpool in 1933, is a toy that involves rods).
Richard Rogers has explicitly connected his design for the Lloyds building in London’s financial district to the look of Meccano. As a child, Rogers’s former partner, Norman Foster, spent his pocket money both on Meccano and on Trix (similar to Meccano, but with more holes).
I offer all this up not only because it is fascinating (well, it is to me), but because it reinforces Dowling’s call to arms.
The Vales draw an unexpectedly clear line from construction toys at a time when such things were almost exclusively marketed to and bought by little boys to aspects of our towns and cities 50 years later.
However, there is a problem. Those in the market for buying such toys for their daughters must now do battle both with the dumbing down of the toy industry and with its reflexive sexism. Fewer such toys exist now and those that do are far less complex to build.
Meanwhile, even my beloved Lego has gone pink, selling kits aimed specifically at girls. The last time I went to buy my eldest niece a box — I long for her to be a master builder — I picked up and then swiftly put down Mia’s Lemonade Stand, a lilac and chartreuse green affair that is part of its ghastly Friends range. I simply could not do it.
Instead, I vowed to myself that as soon as she is old enough, I will give her the Lego Architecture kit for Mies van der Rohe’s Farnsworth House, an elegant and supremely fascinating construction, near Chicago, that was at least commissioned by a woman (Edith Farnsworth, in 1945), if not actually built by one.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US