Much attention has been paid to China’s determination to exert its influence over the East and South China seas using both political and military power.
The final few weeks of last year saw a rapid deterioration of the diplomatic goodwill China had built with its maritime neighbors over the past several decades, threatening regional stability and risking an arms race with the US, Taiwan and Japan.
China’s declaration of an air defense identification zone over disputed territories in the East China Sea is far more aggressive than has been acknowledged in the media.
First: China has claimed more islands and waterways than it could actually possess under the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea. Since 2010, China has regarded the East and South China seas as legitimate areas in which to flex its muscles, build garrisons on strategic islands and strengthen air and naval strengh as a challenge to the US.
The new air defense identification zone has added uncertainty to the situation and disrupted the balance of power in the western Pacific. When US Vice President Joe Biden recently called on Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) to abandon the zone, China viewed the US as an interloper to its sphere of influence and was determined to militarize the maritime frontier.
Second: No institutional mechanism exists under international law to deal with overlapping claims to maritime territories in Asia. The latest diplomatic tensions have arisen due to a longstanding territorial conflict in which China proclaims to have sovereignty and control over its maritime peripheries.
The territorial disputes have sharpened the irreconcilable differences between China and neighboring countries over the control of maritime space — especially groups of resource-rich islands — and the exercise of maritime jurisdiction related to actions taking place in international waters. Unless there is a multilateral framework to resolve conflicts among the claimant states, maritime rifts are likely to escalate this year.
Detecting the rising discontent over China’s power projection, the US has not only clarified the status of the East and South China seas as being open transportation corridors for all nations, but has also urged Japan, South Korea and ASEAN to negotiate with China multilaterally, rather than through individual bargains that would only favor Beijing at the expense of weaker states such as the Philippines and Vietnam.
To the US and its allies, freedom of the seas is an important international principle that guarantees the freedom of navigation for vessels of all countries.
Any nation’s attempt to make an open-ocean zone fall under its territorial sovereignty contradicts this legal principle and disrupts the global system.
Out of fear of being marginalized, China condemned ASEAN for siding with the US and Japan. In bullying Southeast Asia, it has undercut decade-long diplomatic reassurances and confidence-building efforts.
China has succeeded in using Cambodia to outmaneuver the claimant countries in ASEAN, especially the Philippines and Vietnam. This tactic was based on a premise that ASEAN lacked the collective will to confront Beijing.
However, China appears to have overplayed its hand in declaring the new air zone. Making other countries submissive is different from the art of winning trust and exercising leadership.
Trust and leadership involves a sense of responsibility to uphold international rules and norms. China’s refusal to back down in the maritime territorial disputes reveals the remnants of Cold War thinking and insensitivity toward other nations’ desires for peace and stability.
The costs of the Chinese power projection have outweighed all the benefits, jeopardizing its relations with Taiwan, Japan, South Korea and Southeast Asia.
In this hostile environment, Xi may want to revisit former leader Deng Xiaoping’s (鄧小平) idea of lying low and biding time, aimed at normalizing relationships with the international community and diffusing worldwide concerns about China’s threat.
In a nutshell, China does not need to follow the logic of a zero-sum game in its encounters with other states. Its gain should not lead to another country’s loss.
To build trust and confidence with the global community, China should recognize the East and South China seas as international transportation corridors for all countries, and formulate innovative mechanisms for dispute resolution.
Otherwise, it will miss the opportunity to set the course of action for the future and wll find itself caught in serious diplomatic rifts.
Joseph Tse-Hei Lee is professor of history at Pace University in New York.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers