When the Hong Kong school year began in September, tutor Tony Chow (周文豪) arranged to have his face plastered on the sides of double-decker buses to raise his profile.
For many of Chow’s students, the advertisements may be the closest they will ever get to him.
The 30-year-old teaches English grammar to thousands of secondary school pupils, who attend his after-school lessons or watch video replays of them at Modern Education’s 14 branches.
Chow is a celebrity tutor in Hong Kong, where there is big money to be made offering extracurricular lessons to parents desperately seeking an edge for their children preparing for the city’s intense public-entrance exam for university.
Global student rankings out last week highlighted the city’s cutthroat academic atmosphere. Hong Kong teens, along with Shanghai, Singapore, South Korea and Japan, dominated the list compiled by the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. US students showed little improvement and failed to reach the top 20 in math, science or reading.
Students in East Asian societies have long relied on so-called “cram schools,” but Hong Kong has taken them to a new level in recent years, with the majority of students attending the city’s nearly 1,000 tutorial centers.
Academies use brash marketing, dressing their tutors in miniskirts and high heels or leather jackets to make them look like pop stars. Advertisements for these “tutor kings” and “tutor queens,” as they are known in Cantonese, are splashed on giant roadside billboards, on the sides of shopping malls and on the front pages of newspapers.
Many promise students they can help them ace the entrance exam.
“Basically the examination is just a game. When there’s a game there must be both winners and losers. They have to know the tricks on how to win the game,” Chow said. “We are trying to get them the shortcuts, the fast track to the answers.”
Chow and others promise, for example, that they will help students learn keywords that many believe examiners award points for when used in written answers.
Hong Kong’s tutorial industry is worth US$260 million a year, according to a report by market research firm Synovate commissioned by Modern Education’s parent company, which went public in 2011 and is one of a handful dominating the market.
The industry has made some tutors extremely wealthy. One of the best known, Richard Eng (伍經衡), is famous for his love of Lamborghinis and Louis Vuitton. He is credited with starting the transformation of Hong Kong’s tutoring industry starting in 1996 when he had the inspiration to market himself like a performer.
While Chow will not say how much he earns, the top tutors can be paid many times what a public school teacher earns. Modern Education’s highest-paid tutor earns at least HK$16 million (US$2 million) a year, according to its parent company’s latest annual report. The second-highest earned US$1.9 million and third-highest made US$1 million. Their identities were not disclosed.
MARKETING
The salary figures may not include marketing costs, which the schools share with the tutors, who work as contractors.
Chow says he spends thousands of dollars printing glossy exercise books he gives free to students. He split the cost of the bus ads — HK$15,000 (US$1,930) per bus — with Modern Education.
Another tutor, Karson Oten Fan Karno (范浩揚), moonlights as a rapper and is popularly known by the name K. Oten.
Lung Siu Kwan (龍小菌) was a public school teacher who released an album of pop songs and was then recruited as a Chinese tutor by the King’s Glory Education chain.
Facebook profiles, YouTube videos and other social media are also part of the aggressive marketing tactics.
“Every night after they finish their classes I will send them messages through WeChat,” a popular smartphone app, Chow said.
After all, he said, “the most powerful tool is word of mouth within students.”
To many students, the glamorized images of Hong Kong’s celebrity tutors has also, paradoxically, made their regular teachers appear less credible.
“It’s like he has the teaching skills whereas I don’t know if my teachers have the same qualification,” said Amy Wong, a 16-year-old who was one of about 60 pupils taking Chow’s weekly class on a recent night at branch in a suburban shopping mall.
Some students watched the lesson through a glass wall — regulations limit classrooms to 45 pupils so cram schools get around this by subdividing the room.
Others who could not make his live lesson watched a replay at other branches around the city.
However, the most they saw of Chow was a close-up of his hand using a pen to complete English idioms in a workbook while explaining almost exclusively in Cantonese.
ANXIETY TRADE
Questions from students are discouraged. Modern Education, which has 428,000 course enrollments, charges up to US$74 for four of Chow’s one-hour classes each month.
Nearly three-quarters of Hong Kong students attend tutorial classes, according to a survey by Mark Bray, director of Hong Kong University’s Comparative Education Research Center.
With the rate so high, others “that don’t go to tutoring begin to feel nervous,” Bray said. “The companies like that, the companies like nervous people and they trade on anxiety.”
Pressure is also rising after Hong Kong’s education authorities last year reduced the number of university entrance exams to one from two. The move was designed to reduce student anxiety, but Bray said it had the opposite effect, turning it into a “make or break” test.
He said Hong Kong’s tutoring companies are using technology to lower costs to students, but that does not necessarily mean students are learning as much as they would if they had one-on-one tutoring.
“It’s a bit like the fast-food Industry. You can go to a fancy restaurant and have white table cloth and beautiful music in the background or you can go to fast food,” Bray said. “You can still fill your stomach, but maybe the quality is different.”
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers