Seven opposition legislators are pushing for “diverse family formation” through three proposals. Of them, the first proposal for marriage equality (婚姻平權草案), which aims to amend the Civil Code to legalize same-sex marriage, was the only one that passed the first reading at the Legislative Yuan. Although 22 legislators signed the draft to show their support, more legislators from the ruling and opposition camps are opposed to it.
Just before Human Rights Day, Premier Jiang Yi-huah (江宜樺) said that since there was no consensus on the issue, it seemed it would be difficult for society to accept the proposal. Taipei Mayor Hau Lung-bin (郝龍斌) even published an editorial recently entitled “Taiwan is not ready for diverse family formation,” calling on opposition lawmakers to withdraw the draft act. Is Taiwan really not ready for this? The numbers speak for themselves.
Opinion poll results over the past few years show a constant increase in the support for same-sex marriage. According to a TVBS poll conducted in April last year, 49 percent of people actually supported gay marriage, while 29 percent opposed it. A China Times poll conducted in August last year showed that 56 percent supported it while 31 percent were opposed. A United Daily News poll conducted in the same year also showed that 55 percent supported it while 37 percent were opposed.
According to a survey published by Academia Sinica’s Institute of Sociology in April, 52 percent of respondents believed that homosexuals should be allowed to marry. The figure was close to that of a poll conducted by the Taiwan Alliance to Promote Civil Partnership Rights in August, which showed a support rating of 53 percent. To put it simply, a consensus leaning toward same-sex marriage is forming, and it is likely to eventually enter the mainstream.
It is interesting to note that in all polls, support among younger generations is much higher than in older generations. Take the TVBS poll for example: Those in their 20s and 30s were most supportive of same-sex marriage, with an approval rating above 60 percent. These poll results show that many Taiwanese, especially younger generations, are ready for gay marriage. Despite claiming that it respects human rights, President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration is not ready for this. When will it be?
The world was saddened by the recent death of former South African president Nelson Mandela. If, in the face of racial segregation, he took the passive approach and concluded that change was unnecessary because there was no consensus among all the different racial groups and that South Africa was not ready to move on, then his country would never have progressed.
Some local politicians and religious leaders mistakenly believe that homosexuality is a moral sin, but even Pope Francis has made repeated public calls for the church to accept homosexuality. He once said that, “If someone is gay and he searches for the Lord and has good will, who am I to judge?” So who are those Taiwanese politicians and religious leaders to judge?
I do not expect Taiwan’s politicians and religious leaders to live up to the example of Mandela or the pope, but they must understand that “gay rights are human rights,” as former US secretary of state Hillary Rodham Clinton declared in a speech to the UN.
Our officials should change their passive attitude and take action to help the public understand the draft amendment, the related agencies should promote marriage equality through various activities, such as workshops for school teachers and civil servants, and the legislature should hold public hearings on the issue nationwide. Both the ruling and opposition parties should also communicate with their homophobic lawmakers so as to save their parties’ images.
Let’s get ready for a gayer, fairer and better society.
Chang Sheng-en is an assistant professor of English at Shih Hsin University.
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS