Guilt is good. It’s the feature that distinguishes the rest of the population from psychopaths. It’s the sensation you are able to feel when you possess a capacity for empathy. But guilt inhibits consumption. So a global industry has developed to smother it with a 13-tog duvet of celebrities, cartoon characters and elevator music. It seeks to persuade us not to see and feel. It seems to work.
Last year’s Greendex Survey found that people in poorer countries feel, on average, much guiltier about their impact on the natural world than people in rich countries. The places in which people feel least guilty are, in this order: Germany, the US, Australia and Britain, while the people of India, China, Mexico and Brazil have the greatest concerns. Our guilt, the survey reported, exists in inverse proportion to the amount of damage our consumption does. This is the opposite of what a thousand editorials in the corporate press tell us: that people cannot afford to care until they become rich. The evidence suggests we cease to care only when we become rich.
“Consumers in countries such as Mexico, Brazil, China and India,” the survey stated, “tend to be most concerned about issues like climate change, air and water pollution, species loss and shortages of fresh water... In contrast, the economy and the cost of energy and fuel elicit the most concern among American, French and British consumers.” The more you have, the more important money becomes. My guess is that in poorer countries empathy has not been as dulled by decades of mindless consumption.
Watch the latest advertisement for Toys “R” Us in the US. A man dressed up as a ranger herds children onto a green bus belonging to the “Meet the Trees Foundation.” “Today we’re taking the kids on the best field trip they could wish for,” the ranger says, “and they don’t even know it.”
On the bus he starts teaching them (poorly) about leaves. The children yawn and shift in their seats. Suddenly he announces: “But we’re not going to the forest today,” and says while stripping off his ranger shirt, “we’re going to Toys “R” Us, guys!” The children go berserk. “We’re going to get to play with all the toys, and you’re going to get to choose any toy that you want!” The children run in slow motion down the aisles of the shop, then almost swoon as they caress their chosen toys.
Nature is tedious, plastic is thrilling. The inner-city children I took to the woods a few weeks ago would tell a different story, but if you drive the message home often enough, it becomes true.
Christmas permits the global bullshit industry to exploit values with which so many of us would like the holiday season to be invested — love, warmth and community spirit — to sell things no one needs or wants. Sadly, like all newspapers, the Guardian participates in this exploitation. The Nov. 23 issue of its magazine contained what appeared to be a shopping list to prepare for the last days of the Roman Empire. The magazine contains a smart cuckoo clock to replace those not up to the mark, a remotely operated kettle, a soap dispenser at £55 (US$90), a mahogany skateboard (disgracefully, the origin of the wood is not mentioned by either the Guardian or the retailer), a pappardelle rolling pin at £25, chocolate ornaments and a £16 box of garden twine.
Are we so bored, so unaffected, that we need this junk to ignite one last spark of hedonistic satisfaction? Have people become so immune to feelings of fellowship that they spend £46 on a jar of dog treats or £6.50 on personalized crackers rather than give money to a better cause? Or is this the Western world’s solution, spending ridiculous amounts of money on conspicuously useless gifts to enhance our social status? If so, we must have forgotten that those who are impressed by money are not worth impressing.
To service this peculiar form of mental illness, we must wear down the Earth, ream the surface of the planet with great holes, fleetingly address the destruction then dump the resultant waste into another hole. A report by the Gaia Foundation indicates explosive growth in the pace of mineral mining: cobalt production up 165 percent in 10 years, iron ore is up by 180 percent and a 50 percent increase in nonferrous metals exploration from 2010 to 2011.
The products of this destruction are found in: electronics, plastics, ceramics, paints, dyes and the materials in which our gifts are packaged. As the richest deposits are mined, more land must be used to maintain production rates. Even the most precious and environmentally destructive materials are jettisoned at the start of the next product trend. The British government reported that a ton of gold used in electronics is thrown into landfills every year.
In August, a row started within the conservative party. Environment minister Lord de Mauley urged people to repair gadgets rather than throwing them in the trash. This, he said, was necessary to reduce the amount of landfill material and in line with European waste directives the Daily Telegraph reported in August that “the proposals risk alarming businesses that are struggling to increase demand for their products.”
The Tory MP Douglas Carswell asked: “Since when do we need government to tell us what to do with broken toasters?... Having ruined our prospects of economic growth, the Eurocrats now seem to be giving us advice on how to make do and mend. The sooner we leave the European Union, the better.”
He understands that the government’s program for economic recovery depends on endless consumption and that if people start repairing things the scheme fails. Stated differently, mahogany skateboards and e-kettles are products of a saturated market, and the economic growth to which we must bow demands spending without end.
“But old clothes are beastly,” the incessant whisper says. “We always throw away old clothes, ending is better than mending and ending is better than mending.” A brave new world seems less fantastic every year.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers