China’s military could struggle to cope with the demands for intensified surveillance and interception if it tries to enforce the rules in its new air defense zone over islands at the heart of a territorial dispute with Japan.
Regional military analysts and diplomats said China’s network of air defense radars, surveillance planes and fighter jets would be stretched by extensive patrols across its air defense identification zone, which is about two-thirds the size of Britain.
However, some said that even limited action could still spark alarm across a nervous region — and serve China’s desire to pressure Japan.
China published the coordinates of its zone in the East China Sea on Nov. 23 and warned it would take “defensive emergency measures” against aircraft that failed to identify themselves properly in the airspace.
It is already being tested.
Two unarmed US B-52 bombers on a training mission flew over the disputed islands on Nov. 25 without informing Beijing, while Japan’s main commercial airlines ignored the rules when their planes passed through the airspace on Wednesday last week.
The Chinese Ministry of Defense said it had monitored the entire progress of the US bombers.
The Pentagon said the planes had neither been observed nor contacted by Chinese aircraft.
A Japanese government source said China’s military, while growing rapidly after many years of double-digit budget increases, still did not have the radars or fighters to cover a zone of such size across international airspace.
“China will not implement [the zone] fully because they do not have enough assets ... but they will try to scare smaller nations,” said the source, who declined to be identified because he was not authorized to speak to the media on the topic.
While China could field an extensive array of surveillance capabilities, including ship-borne radar, there will still be gaps, added Christian Le Miere, an East Asia military specialist at the independent International Institute of Strategic Studies in London.
“It is just not yet clear how they are going to enforce it,” he said. “It may be more a rhetorical position to serve a political end.”
NOT A NO-FLY ZONE
China’s creation of the zone triggered a storm of criticism from Washington and Tokyo, with both countries accusing Beijing of trying to change the “status quo” in the region.
Some experts have said the move was aimed at chipping away at Tokyo’s claim to administrative control over the area, including the Diaoyutai Islands (釣魚台), known as the Senkakus in Japan and claimed by both Taiwan and China.
Japan and the US have their own air defense zones, but only require aircraft to file flight plans and identify themselves if those planes intend to pass through national airspace.
Gary Li, a Beijing-based senior analyst with the consulting group IHS Aerospace, Defence and Maritime, said he did not believe China would try to replicate in the air what it had done at sea by keeping a rotating presence of coast guard ships on standby near the islands.
“I think it will be more a case of China flying enough to make a point — it is quite a strain on any force to maintain some kind of 24-hour presence in the air,” he said. “It must be remembered that this is not a no-fly zone — China doesn’t have to operate extensive patrols to make its presence felt.”
Patrol ships from China and Japan have been shadowing each other near the islets on and off for months, raising fears that a confrontation could develop into a clash.
There have also been several incidents involving military aircraft flying close to each other. In October, Chinese military aircraft flew near Japan three days in a row, and Japan scrambled fighter jets each time in response.
While China had significantly improved the quality and number of surveillance aircraft operated by its navy and air force over the last decade, Li said he believed coastal air defense radars would be used for routine coverage of the new zone.
Planes — whether surveillance or fighter jets — would be used generally for more specific tasks, he said.
Indeed, attention is likely to focus on airfields and coastal radar stations around Shanghai — strategically placed near the top of the zone.
Independent academic and commercial analysis of China’s air force and naval aviation deployments shows a concentration of surveillance aircraft, together with expanding fleets of indigenous J-10 and Russian-acquired Su-30 jet fighters.
An estimated 45 surveillance planes are also within range of the zone, along with as many as 160 fighters around Shanghai — including some aging locally produced J-7 aircraft.
Most of the surveillance planes are variants of the long-range, locally manufactured Y-8, equipped for separate tasks, such as early-warning patrols, electronic intelligence gathering, as well as ship and submarine surveillance. Particular regional attention is focused on four larger KJ-2000 Airborne Warning and Control System aircraft, converted Russian Il-76 planes, based out of Jiangsu Province, neighboring Shanghai, and within reach of Japan and Taiwan.
“We don’t think China’s AWACS planes and their abilities are up to the standard of the US and its allies,” one Asian military attache in Hong Kong said. “But we can be sure they are getting there — and any extensive enforcement operation could bring them into full play — so we are watching them closely.”
NO ‘HOT-DOGGING’
The potential behavior of Chinese pilots during any intensified campaign is also drawing scrutiny — with US officials particularly worried about the risk of miscalculations or accidents.
The days of Chinese fighter pilots buzzing US surveillance planes largely ended when one died in a collision with a US aircraft in 2001.
US military pilots say their Chinese counterparts have generally stopped any fast and loose maneuvers during routine intercepts after the fatal collision above the South China Sea sparked a crisis in Sino-US ties.
“You just don’t see the hot-dogging you used to see up there,” one pilot said. “As China’s got a lot more assets, its pilots have gotten a lot more professional.”
While insisting the zone would be here to stay, Chinese officials and military officers have insisted that Beijing fully intended to comply with international law.
Senior naval adviser Rear Admiral Yin Zhou (尹卓) told state broadcaster CCTV that it was illegal to shoot down planes in international airspace.
“Once you enter our territorial airspace, we can shoot you down,” he said. “But beforehand, I would have warned you: If you don’t report and enter our territorial airspace, we would take drastic measures.”
However, a Chinese Ministry of Defense spokesman would not confirm whether China’s interception aircraft would be armed as they patrolled the zone.
“For unidentified or threatening flying objects in the [zone], the Chinese side will, according to different situations, take timely identification, surveillance ... and control measures to deal with it,” the spokesman said. “We hope that relevant parties give proactive cooperation to jointly maintain flying safety.”
Additional reporting by Ben Blanchard, Linda Sieg and Grace Li
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US