US Vice President Joe Biden’s trip to Japan, China and North Korea this week comes at a moment of major diplomatic tension in the region. Last week, Beijing unilaterally declared a new air defense identification zone to much international concern.
The zone covers an area that encompasses the Diaoyutai Islands (釣魚台), known as the Senkakus in Japan, which are claimed by Taiwan, China and Japan. The dispute over the islands dates back at least three decades, but became much more heated last year when the Japanese government decided to nationalize three islets in the area.
Since the declaration of the air defense zone last week, Beijing has insisted that all flights, civilian and military, must submit flight plans before entering it.
The US and the EU have urged caution to calm regional tensions, and this is likely to be a theme Biden will emphasize in Tokyo, Beijing and Seoul.
In response to China’s declaration, US President Barack Obama’s administration has recommended that US commercial aircraft report their flight plans to Beijing, although US military aircraft continue to operate without notification.
Meanwhile, Japan, which also continues to operate flights in the zone, announced on Saturday that it has asked the UN organization that oversees civil aviation to examine whether the zone could undermine aviation safety.
Tokyo’s goal is to enhance international scrutiny of the issue in a bid to undercut Beijing.
While air zones are commonplace across the world, there is concern that China has both imposed this measure unilaterally and warned that it will take unspecified “emergency defensive measures” if aircraft do not submit flight plans. China has already frayed nerves by sending fighter jets to investigate US and Japanese aircraft in the zone.
Whatever Beijing’s motives in declaring the zone, it will add to the growing international tide of suspicion and sometimes even outright hostility as China increasingly asserts its growing power.
The central challenge that China faces is that its soft power — its ability to win the hearts and minds of other nations and influence their governments through attraction rather than coercion or payment — has lagged far behind its hard power built on its growing economic and military might.
In Japan, for instance, public favor toward China fell from 34 percent in 2011 to 15 percent last year largely in response to China’s new international assertiveness, according to Pew Global.
In the US, public favor toward China fell to 40 percent last year from 51 percent in 2011. Issues such as Beijing’s alleged currency manipulation, the large size of the US trade deficit with China and the large financial debt the US owes Beijing and alleged Chinese cybersecurity attacks on US interests have affected US public opinion.
With distrust of China growing, many countries in the Asia-Pacific region are actively strengthening their diplomatic alliances, particularly with Washington, in a bid to balance Beijing’s growing economic and military strength.
This is a political headache leaders in China could do without and it must now think carefully about how to enhance the nation’s image.
Beijing’s most pressing concern should be to restart a process of addressing the concerns about its intentions foreign governments have.
It needs to intensify efforts to be seen as a responsible, peaceful power and match its rhetoric with action.
Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) made a good start toward this goal in his landmark summit with Obama last summer.
He pledged to form a “new model of cooperation” and that “China and the United States must find a new path ... one that is different from the inevitable confrontation and conflict between the major countries of the past.”
As the Pew Global data indicated, China’s international image would also benefit from enhanced public diplomacy to win more foreign “hearts and minds.”
On a symbolic level, example measures might include using the nation’s growing capabilities in space travel for high-profile international cooperation projects. Surveys underline that China’s strength in science and technology is admired around the world.
A related problem to be tackled is that Chinese state institutions often lack legitimacy and credibility when it comes to international communications.
One solution might be expanding the number of non-state groups — including from civil society networks, diaspora communities, student and academic groups, and business networks — involved in diplomatic outreach.
There also needs to be stronger Chinese commitment to domestic political change, transparency and concrete steps toward democratization.
Many in the international community are likely to remain wary of China while it clamps down on citizens who seek domestic reform, including human rights activists.
The challenges ahead for China are deep-seated and will require sustained investment and significant reform.
However, unless they are tackled, the country’s reputation will slide, which will stymie its ambitions as a superpower.
Andrew Hammond was formerly a geopolitical analyst at Oxford Analytica and a special adviser in former British prime minister Tony Blair’s government.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers